咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Seismic fragility assessment o... 收藏

Seismic fragility assessment of revised MRT buildings considering typical construction changes

作     者:Rakesh DUMARU Hugo RODRIGUES Humberto VARUM Rakesh DUMARU;Hugo RODRIGUES;Humberto VARUM

作者机构:CONSTRUCT-LESEFaculty of Engineering(FEUP)University of PortoPorto 4200-465Portugal RISCOSchool of Technology and ManagementPolytechnic Institute of LeiriaLeiria 2411-901Portugal 

出 版 物:《Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering》 (结构与土木工程前沿(英文版))

年 卷 期:2020年第14卷第1期

页      面:241-266页

核心收录:

学科分类:1305[艺术学-设计学(可授艺术学、工学学位)] 081405[工学-防灾减灾工程及防护工程] 08[工学] 0813[工学-建筑学] 0814[工学-土木工程] 

主  题:mid-rise buildings revised NBC 205:2012 masonry infill walls configurations of infill walls vulnerability assessment and inter-storey drift 

摘      要:The present study investigates the vulnerability assessment of the prototype revised Mandatory Rule of Thumb(MRT)buildings initially designed and detailed for three storeys bare frame building;later modified through variable number of storeys(three,four,and five)and different arrangement of infill walls(bare frame,soft-storey,irregular infilled,and fully infilled).The application of infill walls increases the fundamental frequencies,stiffness,and maximum strength capacity,but reduces the deformation capability than the bare frame building.The vulnerability was also reduced through infill walls,where the probability of exceeding partial-collapse and collapse damage reduced by 80% and 50%,respectively.Furthermore,the increased in storeys(three to five)also increases the failure probability,such that partial-collapse and collapse for fully infilled increases by almost 55% and 80%,respectively.All obtained results and discussions concluded that the structural sections and details assigned for MRT building is not sufficient if considered as bare frame and soft-storey.And increase in number of storeys causes building highly vulnerable although the infill walls were considered.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分