咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Differences in transportation ... 收藏

Differences in transportation and leisure physical activity by neighborhood design controlling for residential choice

Differences in transportation and leisure physical activity by neighborhood design controlling for residential choice

作     者:Gavin R.McCormack Mohammad Javad Koohsari Koichiro Oka Christine M.Friedenreich Anita Blackstaffe Francisco Uribe Alaniz Brenlea Farkas 

作者机构:Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryAlbertaT2N 4Z6Canada School of ArchitecturePlanning and LandscapeUniversity of CalgaryAlbertaT2N4N1Canada Faculty of Sport SciencesWaseda UniversityTokyo169-8050Japan Behavioural Epidemiology LaboratoryBaker Heart and Diabetes InstituteMelbourneVIC3004Australia Mary MacKillop Institute for Health ResearchAustralian Catholic UniversityMelbourneVIC3000Australia Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention ResearchCancerControl AlbertaAlberta Health ServicesCalgaryAlbertaT2S 3C3Canada 

出 版 物:《Journal of Sport and Health Science》 (运动与健康科学(英文))

年 卷 期:2019年第8卷第6期

页      面:532-539页

核心收录:

学科分类:08[工学] 0812[工学-计算机科学与技术(可授工学、理学学位)] 

基  金:the Pathways to Health project funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR MOP126133) by a CIHR Foundations Scheme Grant (FDN-154331) supported by a CIHR New Investigator Award (MSH-130162) supported by a JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research in Japan (#17716) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science supported by the MEXTSupported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities (2015-2019) the Japan Ministry of Education,Culture,Sports,Science and Technology (S1511017) 

主  题:Active transportation Built environment Self-selection Urban design Walkability 

摘      要:Background:Cross-sectional studies provide useful insight about the associations between the built environment and physical activity(PA),particularly when reasons for neighborhood choice are *** study analyzed the relationship between levels of weekly transportation and leisure PA among 3 neighborhood designs,statistically adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and reasons for neighborhood ***:A stratified random sample of adults(age20 years)living in Calgary(Canada)neighborhoods with different neighborhood designs(grid,warped-grid,and curvilinear)and socioeconomic status completed a self-administered questionnaire capturing PA,sociodemographic characteristics,and reasons for neighborhood choice(response rate=10.1%;n=1023).Generalized linear models estimated associations between neighborhood design and transportation and leisure PA outcomes(participation(any ***)and volume(metabolic equivalent:h/week)),adjusting for neighborhood socioeconomic status,sociodemographic characteristics(gender,age,ethnicity,education,household income,marital status,children,vehicle access,dog ownership,and injury),and reasons for neighborhood choice(e.g.,proximity and quality of recreational and utilitarian destinations,proximity to work,highway access,aesthetics,and sense of community).Results:Overall,854 participants had resided in their neighborhood for at least 12 months and provided complete *** with those living in curvilinear neighborhoods,grid neighborhood participants had greater odds(p0.05)of participating in any transportation walking(odds ratio(OR)=2.17),transportation and leisure cycling(OR=2.39 and OR=1.70),active transportation(OR=2.16),and high-intensity leisure PA(≥6 metabolic equivalent;OR=1.74),*** were no neighborhood differences in the volume of any transportation or leisure PA *** for neighborhood selection had minimal impact on the statistical or practical importance of model estimates.C

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分