Differences in transportation and leisure physical activity by neighborhood design controlling for residential choice
Differences in transportation and leisure physical activity by neighborhood design controlling for residential choice作者机构:Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryAlbertaT2N 4Z6Canada School of ArchitecturePlanning and LandscapeUniversity of CalgaryAlbertaT2N4N1Canada Faculty of Sport SciencesWaseda UniversityTokyo169-8050Japan Behavioural Epidemiology LaboratoryBaker Heart and Diabetes InstituteMelbourneVIC3004Australia Mary MacKillop Institute for Health ResearchAustralian Catholic UniversityMelbourneVIC3000Australia Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention ResearchCancerControl AlbertaAlberta Health ServicesCalgaryAlbertaT2S 3C3Canada
出 版 物:《Journal of Sport and Health Science》 (运动与健康科学(英文))
年 卷 期:2019年第8卷第6期
页 面:532-539页
核心收录:
学科分类:08[工学] 0812[工学-计算机科学与技术(可授工学、理学学位)]
基 金:the Pathways to Health project funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR MOP126133) by a CIHR Foundations Scheme Grant (FDN-154331) supported by a CIHR New Investigator Award (MSH-130162) supported by a JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research in Japan (#17716) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science supported by the MEXTSupported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities (2015-2019) the Japan Ministry of Education,Culture,Sports,Science and Technology (S1511017)
主 题:Active transportation Built environment Self-selection Urban design Walkability
摘 要:Background:Cross-sectional studies provide useful insight about the associations between the built environment and physical activity(PA),particularly when reasons for neighborhood choice are *** study analyzed the relationship between levels of weekly transportation and leisure PA among 3 neighborhood designs,statistically adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and reasons for neighborhood ***:A stratified random sample of adults(age20 years)living in Calgary(Canada)neighborhoods with different neighborhood designs(grid,warped-grid,and curvilinear)and socioeconomic status completed a self-administered questionnaire capturing PA,sociodemographic characteristics,and reasons for neighborhood choice(response rate=10.1%;n=1023).Generalized linear models estimated associations between neighborhood design and transportation and leisure PA outcomes(participation(any ***)and volume(metabolic equivalent:h/week)),adjusting for neighborhood socioeconomic status,sociodemographic characteristics(gender,age,ethnicity,education,household income,marital status,children,vehicle access,dog ownership,and injury),and reasons for neighborhood choice(e.g.,proximity and quality of recreational and utilitarian destinations,proximity to work,highway access,aesthetics,and sense of community).Results:Overall,854 participants had resided in their neighborhood for at least 12 months and provided complete *** with those living in curvilinear neighborhoods,grid neighborhood participants had greater odds(p0.05)of participating in any transportation walking(odds ratio(OR)=2.17),transportation and leisure cycling(OR=2.39 and OR=1.70),active transportation(OR=2.16),and high-intensity leisure PA(≥6 metabolic equivalent;OR=1.74),*** were no neighborhood differences in the volume of any transportation or leisure PA *** for neighborhood selection had minimal impact on the statistical or practical importance of model estimates.C