An overview of ischemic preconditioning in exercise performance:A systematic review

作     者：Maxime Caru Ariane Levesque Francois Lalonde Daniel Cumier 

作者机构：Laboratory of Pathophysiology of EXercise(LPEX)School of Kinesiology and Physical Activity SciencesFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MontrealMontrealQuebec H3T1J4Canada Department of PsychologyUniversity of Paris-NanterreNanterre 92000France Laboratoire EA 4430-Clinique Psychanalyse Developpement(CliPsyD)University of Paris-NanterreNanterre 92000France CHUSte-Justine Research CenterCHUSte-JustineMontreal H3T1C5Canada Department of PsychologyMcGill UniversityMontrealQuebec H3A 1G1Canada Department of Physical Activity SciencesFaculty of SciencesUniversite du Quebec a MontrealMontrealQuebec H2L 2C4Canada 

出 版 物：《Journal of Sport and Health Science》 (运动与健康科学（英文）)

年 卷 期：2019年第8卷第4期

页      面：355-369页

核心收录：

学科分类：0403[教育学-体育学] 04[教育学] 1002[医学-临床医学] 1010[医学-医学技术（可授医学、理学学位）] 

主　　题：Exercise Human performance IPC protocols Ischemic preconditioning Sports science 

摘      要：Ischemic preconditioning(IPC)is an attractive method for athletes owing to its potential to enhance exercise performance.However,the effectiveness of the IPC intervention in the field of sports science remains mitigated.The number of cycles of ischemia and reperfusion,as well as the duration of the cycle,varies from one study to another;Thus,the aim of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive review examining the IPC literature in sports science.A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed(MEDLINE)(from 1946 to May 2018),Web of Science(sport sciences)(from 1945 to May 2018),and EMBASE(from 1974 to May 2018).We included all studies investigating the effects of IPC on exercise performance in human subjects.To assess scientific evidence for each study,this review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.The electronic database search generated 441 potential articles that were screened for eligibility.A total of 52 studies were identified as eligible and valid for this systematic review.The studies included were of high quality,with 48 of the 52 studies having a ran?domized,controlled trial design.Most studied showed that IPC intervention can be beneficial to exercise performance.However,IPC intervention seems to be more beneficial to healthy subjects who wish to enhance their performance in aerobic exercises than athletes.Thus,this systematic review highlights that a better knowledge of the mechanisms generated by the IPC intervention would make it possible to optimize the protocols according to the characteristics of the subjects with the aim of suggesting to the subjects the best possible experience of IPC intervention.