咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Warming hiatus-and evergreen c... 收藏

Warming hiatus-and evergreen conifers in Altay-Sayan Region,Siberia

Warming hiatus and evergreen conifers in Altay-Sayan Region, Siberia

作     者:Viacheslav I.KHARUK Sergei T.IM Il'ya A.PETROV 

作者机构:Sukachev Institute of ForestFederal Scientific CenterRussian Academy of ScienceSiberian BranchAcademgorodok 50/28Krasnoyarsk660036Russia Siberian Federal UniversitySuobodny str.79Krasnoyarsk 660041Russia Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and TechnologyKrasnoyarsky rabochy str.31Krasnoyarsk 660014Russia 

出 版 物:《Journal of Mountain Science》 (山地科学学报(英文))

年 卷 期:2018年第15卷第12期

页      面:2579-2589页

核心收录:

学科分类:0709[理学-地质学] 0819[工学-矿业工程] 07[理学] 0303[法学-社会学] 0708[理学-地球物理学] 0818[工学-地质资源与地质工程] 0705[理学-地理学] 0815[工学-水利工程] 0706[理学-大气科学] 0816[工学-测绘科学与技术] 0813[工学-建筑学] 0704[理学-天文学] 0833[工学-城乡规划学] 0713[理学-生态学] 0834[工学-风景园林学(可授工学、农学学位)] 

基  金:supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grants #18-0500432) supported by the Russian Science Foundation (1774-10113) 

主  题:Growth increment Warming hiatus Warming impact Conifer decline Tree growth Tree mortality Conifer mortality Water stress 

摘      要:Warming hiatus occurred in the AltaySayan Mountain Region, Siberia in c. 1997–2014. We analyzed evergreen conifer(EGC) stands area(satellite data) and trees(Siberian pine, Pinus sibirica Du Tour, Siberian fir, Abies sibirica Ledeb.) growth increment(dendrochronology data) response to climate variables before and during the hiatus. During the hiatus, EGC area increased in the highlands(1000 m)(+30%), whereas at low and middle elevations(1000 m. a.s.l.) the EGC area decreased(-7%). The EGC area increase was observed on the rain-ward northwest slopes mainly. In highlands, EGC area increase mainly correlated with summer air temperature, whereas at low and middle elevations EGC area decrease correlated with drought index SPEI and vapor pressure deficit(VPD). EGC mortality(fir and Siberian pine) in lowland was caused by the synergy of water stress(inciting factor) and barkbeetle attacks(contributing factor). Tree growth increment(GI) dynamics differs with respect to elevation. At high elevation(1700 m) GI permanently increased since warming onset, whereas at the middle(900 m) and low elevations(450 m) GI increased until c. 1983 yr. with followed depression. That GI breakpoint occurred about a decade before hiatus onset. In spite of growth depression, during hiatus GI was higher than that in pre-warming period. At high elevation, GI positively responded to elevated June temperatures and negatively to moisture increase(precipitation, root zone moisture content, VPD, and SPEI). At low elevation GI negatively responded to June temperatures and positively to moisture increase. For both, low and high elevation, these patterns persisted throughout the study period(1967–2014). On the contrary, at middle elevations GI dependence on climate variables switch after breakpoint year(1983). Before breakpoint, June air temperature(positive correlation) and moisture(negative correlations) controlled GI. Further temperature increase leads GI depression and switched correlation signs

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分