咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Esophagogastroduodenoscopy wit... 收藏

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with conscious sedation does not interfere with catheter-based 24-h pH monitoring

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with conscious sedation does not interfere with catheter-based 24-h pH monitoring

作     者:Yung-Kuan Tsou Jau-Min Lien Chin-Kuo Chen Cheng-Hui Lin Hsing-Yu Chen Mu-Shien Lee 

作者机构:Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyChang Gung Memorial HospitalChang Gung University College of MedicineTaoyuan 333Taiwan Department of OtolaryngologyChang Gung Memorial HospitalChang Gung University College of MedicineTaoyuan 333Taiwan Center for Traditional Chinese MedicineChang Gung Memorial HospitalChang Gung University College of MedicineTaoyuan 333Taiwan 

出 版 物:《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 (世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版))

年 卷 期:2013年第19卷第11期

页      面:1805-1810页

核心收录:

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 10[医学] 

基  金:Supported by A Grant from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital CMRPG300011 

主  题:Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Conscious sedation pH monitoring Gastroesophageal reflux disease Extraesophageal symptoms 

摘      要:AIM:To investigate the impact of esophagogastroduodenoscopy with conscious sedation on the subsequent 24-h catheter-based pH monitoring.METHODS:Fifty patients with extra-esophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease undergoing ambulatory dual-probe 24-h pH monitoring were enrolled from March 2010 to August 2011.All of the data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively.Thirty-six patients(72%,group A) underwent pH monitoring shortly after esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD) with conscious sedation,and 14 patients(28%,group B) underwent pH monitoring without conscious sedation.The 24-h pH data from two time periods were analyzed:the first 4 h(Period Ⅰ) and the remaining time of the study(Period Ⅱ).RESULTS:The mean age of the patients was 49.6 ± 12.5 years;20 patients(40%) were men.The baseline data,including age,sex,body mass index,reflux esophagitis,the Reflux Symptom Index,and the Reflux Findings Score,were comparable between the two groups.The percentage of total time with a pH 4 and the frequency of acid reflux during Period Ⅰ were not significantly different between the two groups,as measured using both pharyngeal(0.03% ± 0.10% vs 0.07% ± 0.16%,P = 0.32;and 0.07 ± 0.23 episodes/h vs 0.18 ± 0.47 episodes/h,P = 0.33,respectively) and esophageal probes(0.96% ± 1.89% vs 0.42% ± 0.81%,P = 0.59;and 0.74 ± 1.51 episodes/h vs 0.63 ± 0.97 episodes/h,P = 0.49,respectively).The percentage of total time with a pH 4 and the frequency of acid reflux were also not significantly different between Periods I and Ⅱ in group A patients,as measured using both pharyngeal(0.03% ± 0.10% vs 0.23% ± 0.85%,P = 0.21;and 0.07 ± 0.23 episodes/h vs 0.29 ± 0.98 episodes/h,P = 0.22,respectively) and esophageal probes(0.96% ± 1.89% vs 1.11% ± 2.57%,P = 0.55;and 0.74 ± 1.51 episodes/h vs 0.81 ± 1.76 episodes/h,P = 0.55,respectively).CONCLUSION:EGD with conscious sedation does not interfere with the results of subsequent 24-h pH monitoring in patients with extra-esophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分