咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >宫颈癌盆腔淋巴结切除术:腹膜外与腹腔镜两种术式的对比研究 收藏

宫颈癌盆腔淋巴结切除术:腹膜外与腹腔镜两种术式的对比研究

Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer:Extraperitoneal versus laparoscopic appro-ach

作     者:Larciprete G. Casalino B. Segatore M.F. 张新艳 

作者机构:Associazione Fatebenefratelli per la Ricerca (A.Fa.R.)Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyFatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina HospitalP.zza Fatebenefratelli 3900186 RomeItaly 

出 版 物:《世界核心医学期刊文摘(妇产科学分册)》 (Core Journal in Obstetrics/Gynecology)

年 卷 期:2006年第2卷第12期

页      面:16-16页

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100214[医学-肿瘤学] 10[医学] 

主  题:盆腔淋巴结 腹膜外 切除术 腔镜 晚期宫颈癌 淋巴囊肿 手术时间 根治性手术 手术特点 术后疼痛 

摘      要:Objective:To compare the extraperitoneal versus the laparoscopic technique in performing pelvic lymphadenectomy in a series of patients undergoing a radical vaginal hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Study design:Retrospective study with 42 patients undergoing a radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Patients from group A (20 patients) had a laparoscopic lymph node dissection and patients belonging to group B (22 patients) had an extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Historical data,clinical and surgical characteristics,perioperative and post-operative complications were analyzed. Follow-up was conducted according to the oncologic requirements. Results:No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of blood loss,post-operative pain,transfusions,hospital stay and post-operative hematomas. The extraperitoneal group (group B) significantly showed a reduced operating time,a greater number of nodes removed (p 0.05). The only lymphocyst occurred in group B. Conclusions:Extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy can be considered an adequate technique to complement radical vaginal operations for cervical cancer.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分