Does Dust from Arctic Mines Affect Caribou Forage?
Does Dust from Arctic Mines Affect Caribou Forage?作者机构：Canada Centre for Remote Sensing Natural Resources Canada Ottawa Canada ERM Environmental Ressources Management Vancouver Canada Dominion Diamond Ekati Corporation Yellowknife Canada Environment and Natural Resources GNWT Yellowknife Canada Circum Arctic Rangifer Monitoring and Assessment Network Salt Spring Island Canada Tlicho Government Behchoko NT Canada Wek’èezhìi Renewable Resources Board Yellowknife Canada Integrated Ecological Research Ltd. Nelson Canada
出 版 物：《Journal of Environmental Protection》 (环境保护（英文）)
年 卷 期：2017年第8卷第3期
页 面：258-276页
学科分类：1002[医学-临床医学] 100214[医学-肿瘤学] 10[医学]
主 题：Mining Arctic Caribou Habitat Road Dust PM2.5 Vegetation Cover Lichen Soil pH Dust Deposition
摘 要：This study explores how dust from the Ekati Diamond Mine potentially affects the availability and quality of forage on the seasonal range of the Bathurst caribou herd. Understanding the effects of dust as a source of disturbance is important because the Bathurst caribou population has declined by 93% since the middle 1980s and there are reports that caribou in general may avoid mining projects. There are several challenges for quantifying dust impacts: 1) Natural variations (e.g., topography, natural disturbance, and soil pH) may also impact forage availability and quality for caribou. To minimize their masking effect, we stratified survey sites into seven land cover classes and selected the most populous class (i.e., the dwarf shrub) for assessing the impact. 2) Within class variation (e.g., the proportion of area covered by rocks where vascular plants and lichen do not grow) can further skew the analysis. We eliminated this problem by examining only the area not covered by rocks. 3) Coarse and fine suspended particulates have different spatial coverages, chemical compositions, and pH values. Consequently, their impacts on caribou forage can be different. To distinguish their impacts, we sampled two areas: transects from the Misery Haul Road that has been in active use vs. those from a rarely used spur road outside the Misery Camp. We sampled percent vegetation cover, soil pH, and dust on leaves along these transects during the summers of 2015 and 2016. Our results indicated that the amount of dust on leaves in a zone of ~1000 m from the Misery Haul Road was 3 - 9 times than that of background sites. The zone of reduced lichen percent cover was also about 1000 m. In contrast, these road dust-induced changes in caribou forage were not observed for the dust-free transect from the spur road.
维普期刊数据库