咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Comparison of intestinal absor... 收藏

Comparison of intestinal absorption of two insulin-mimic vanadyl complexes using Caco-2 monolayers as model system

Comparison of intestinal absorption of two insulin-mimic vanadyl complexes using Caco-2 monolayers as model system

作     者:YANGXiaogai YUANLan WANGKui YANGXiaoda 

作者机构:DepartmentofChemicalBiologySchoolofPharmaceuticalSciencesPekingUniversityBeijing100083China AnalyticalCenterofPekingUniversityBeijing100083China NationalResearchLaboratoriesofNaturalandBiomimeticDrugsSchoolofPharmaceuticalSciencesPekingUniversityBeijing100083China LaboratoriesofPreventiveDrugsSchoolofPharmaceuticalSciencesPekingUniversityBeijing100083China 

出 版 物:《Chinese Science Bulletin》 (中国科学通报)

年 卷 期:2003年第48卷第9期

页      面:876-881页

核心收录:

学科分类:1001[医学-基础医学(可授医学、理学学位)] 10[医学] 

基  金:supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.20101001) 

主  题:氧矾根络合物 Caco-2 肠内吸收 模型系统 胰岛素模拟物 ADME 

摘      要:Intestinal absorption of two oxovanadium complexes, vanadyl acetylacetonate (VO(acac)2) and bis (maltolato)-oxovanadium (VO(ma)2), has been compared using Caco-2 monolayers as a model system. The two compounds are similar in chemical structures but different in glucose-lowering effects. Our experimental results show that they are both transported via passive diffusion with apparent permeabilty coefficients (apical→basolateral) of (82.0 ± 6.7)× 10-7 and (14.6 ± 0.7)× 10-7 cm· s-1, respec-tively. This suggests that absorptivity of VO(acac)2 is much higher than that of VO(ma)2. This difference may be related to the metabolism of either compound, or its ligand, or both in the course of the transport. However, This difference in absorption will cause the great difference in bioavailability,which might account for better efficacy of VO(acac)2 than VO(ma)2 as the insulin-mimic agent.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分