The effect of α-blocker therapy on erectile functions in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostate hyperplasia

作     者：Omer Demir Ismail Ozdemir Ozan Bozkurt Guven Asian Ahmet Adil Esen 

作者机构：Dokuz Eylul University Medical School Department of Urology Inciralti Izmir 35340 Turkey 

出 版 物：《Asian Journal of Andrology》 (亚洲男性学杂志（英文版）)

年 卷 期：2009年第11卷第6期

页      面：716-722页

核心收录：

学科分类：0710[理学-生物学] 071010[理学-生物化学与分子生物学] 081704[工学-应用化学] 07[理学] 08[工学] 0817[工学-化学工程与技术] 0805[工学-材料科学与工程（可授工学、理学学位）] 080502[工学-材料学] 

基　　金：dell?Universita e della Ricerca Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca Università degli Studi di Palermo(FFR 2012) 

主　　题：benign prostate hyperplasia doxazosinlerectile dysfunction lower urinary tract symptoms treatment outcome 

摘      要：In this study we aimed to evaluate the impact of doxazosin treatment on erectile functions in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms （LUTS） and having erectile dysfunction （ED） at baseline. Fifty-three patients with LUTS （IPSS score 〉 7） whose maximum flow rate （Qmax） 〈 15 mL s-1 and PSA 〈 4 ng dL^-1 were enrolled in the study. Patients received doxazosin 4 nag once daily for 6 weeks. Subjective efficacy was assessed by IPSS, IPSS- Quality of Life （IPSS-QoL） for LUTS and efficacy was assessed by International Index of Erectile Function （IIEF） for erectile functions at baseline and sixth weeks. The objective efficacy was assessed by Q The patients were classified according to their self reported erectile status： group I had ED and group II did not have ED. At the endpoint, doxazosin significantly improved the total IPSS score （-7.7 ±6.1, P = 0.006）, IPSS-QoL score （-1.5 ± 1.5, P = 0.024） and Qmax （3.2 ± 4.6 mL s^-1, P = 0.002） over baseline. Mean decrease in IPSS and IPSS-QoL scores after the treatment period were 6.9 ＋ 6.4 （P 〈 0.001） and 0.95 4- 1.80 （P 〈 0.05） in group I, whereas 8.2 4- 5.8 （P 〈 0.001） and 1.9 4- 1.1 in group IX （P 〈 0.001）, respectively. Mean changes of Qmax values were 2.3 4- 3.3 mL s^-1 in group I （P 〈 0.05） and 3.7 4- 5.3 mL s-1 in group II （P 〈 0.001）. The improvement of IIEF-EF scores after the treatment period was only significant for group I. The efficacy of a-blocker therapy for LUTS was better by means of symptomatic relief for patients who did not have ED when compared with patients who had ED at baseline. However, slight improvement in erectile functions with a-blocker therapy was only seen in LUTS patients with ED.