检索结果-南通市图书馆

open partial nephrectomy: One Night Length of Stay Is Safe and Cost Effective

open Journal of Urology 2016年第9期6卷 139-146页

作者： Mohit Sirohi Kyrollis Attalla Harris M. Nagler Erik T. Goluboff Mount Sinai Beth Israel New York USA

Objective: To review our open partial nephrectomy (OPN) experience and compare to known robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) data to determine whether length of stay (LOS) and morbidity are significant drivers in the surgical approach employed for partial nephrectomy. Methods: We reviewed our OPN experience during the last 3 years examining age, tumor size, LOS, pathology, blood loss, complications, recurences, and deaths. Results: Seventy-five patients underwent OPN during this period. Mean age was 59 years, tumor size 2.8 cm, percent malignant 75%, estimated blood loss 350 cc. With a median follow-up of 18 months, there was one urinoma managed by drain-age, one pseudo aneurysm that required embolization and one pulmonary embolism that required anticoagulation. There were no readmissions, no tumor recurences, and no deaths. Our major complication rate was 4% as compared to other trials that re-ported major complication rates between 1% - 9% for RPN and between 3% - 24% for OPN. In the first half of the experience (n = 37), median LOS was 57 hours. Using a pathway encouraging early ambulation and smaller incisions in the second half of the experience (n = 38), median LOS was 35 hours. This is much shorter than reported RPN LOS of 62 - 67 hours and OPN LOS of 108 - 142 hours. Conclusion: OPN can be performed safely and effectively with one night hospital stay. This provides a more cost-effective approach to partial nephrectomy with similar or better complication rates and calls into question the main value drivers of RPN.

关键词： Cost Effective Length of Stay open partial nephrectomy Robotic partial nephrectomy

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy

引用

Chinese Medical Journal 2013年第15期126卷 2938-2942页

作者： ZHENG Jun-hua ZHANG Xiao-long GENG Jiang GUO Chang-cheng ZHANG Xiao-peng CHE Jian-ping YAN Yang PENG Bo WANG Guang-chun XIA sheng-qiang WU Yan Tongji Univ Dept Urol Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10 Shanghai 200072 Peoples R China Nanjing Med Univ Dept Urol Clin Med Coll 1 Nanjing 210002 Jiangsu Peoples R China

Background Most of the literatures on laparoscopic partial nephrectomy （LPN） versus open partial nephrectomy （OPN） focus on technical details and early or mid-term oncologic outcomes, reflecting that the approach is safe and provides mid- term benefits compared with traditional open surgery. However, the difference of long-term oncologic outcome between LPN and OPN remains unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcome of LPN in the treatment of localized renal tumors compared with that of OPN. Methods A systematic search of electronic databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library was conducted. Comparative studies reporting on long-term oncologic outcome of LPN versus OPN were regarded eligible. The odds ratio （OR） and its corresponding 95% confidence intervals （CO were calculated for the oncologic outcomes. The methodologic quality of the included studies was evaluated using the strict criteria of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results Six comparative studies （1495 participants including 555 LPN and 940 OPN） were included in the present study. There was no significant difference between LPN and OPN in 5-year overall survival （OS） rates （OR=1.83, 95% Cl （0.80, 4.19））, 5-year cancer specific survival （CSS） rates （OR=1.09, 95% CI （0.62, 1.92））, and 5-year recurrence free survival （RFS） rates （OR=0.68, 95% CI （0.37, 1.26））. Conclusion The results of this meta-analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in long-term oncologic outcome between LPN and OPN for treatment of localized renal tumors.

关键词： laparoscopic partial nephrectomy meta-analysis outcome open partial nephrectomy renal tumor

来源：

维普期刊数据库

同方期刊数据库评论

在线全文

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：