检索结果-南通市图书馆

Control of atmospheric CO_2.concentrations by 2.50: A calculation on the emission rights of different countries

Science china Earth sciences 2009年第10期52卷 1447-1469页

作者： ding zhongli1, duan {2. {3. quansheng3.& zhang zhiqiang4 1 institute of {3.ology and geophysics, Chinese academy of sciences,{12.,{13. 2.The {3.neral Office of Chinese academy of sciences, beijing 100864,{13. 3.institute of {3.ographic sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese academy of sciences, beijing 100101,{13. 4 The Lanzhou Branch of the National Science Library, the Scientific Information Center for Resources and Environment, Lanzhou 73.000,{13. institute of geology and {2. Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China The general Office of Chinese academy of {2. Beijing China institute of geographic {2. and Natural Resources Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China The Lanzhou Branch of the National Science Library the Scientific Information Center for Resources and Environment Lanzhou China

This paper is to provide quantitative data on some critical issues in anticipation of the forthcoming international negotiations in Denmark on the control of atmospheric CO2.concentrations. Instead of letting only a small number of countries dominate a few controversial dialogues about emissions reductions, a comprehensive global system must be established based on emissions allowances for different countries, to realize the long-term goal of controlling global atmospheric CO2.concentrations. That a system rooted in "cumulative emissions per capita," the best conception of the "common but differentiated responsibilities" principle affirmed by the Kyoto Protocol according to fundamental standards of fairness and justice, was demonstrated. Based on calculations of various countries' cumulative emissions per capita, estimates of their cumulative emissions from 1900 to 2.05, and their annual emissions allowances into the future (2.06―2.50), a 470 ppmv atmospheric CO2.concentration target was set. According to the following four objective indicators―total emissions allowance from 1900 to 2.50, actual emissions from 1900 to 2.05, emissions levels in 2.05, and the average growth rate of emissions from 1996 to 2.05―all countries and regions whose population was more than 3.0000 in 2.05 were divided into four main groups: countries with emissions deficits, countries and regions needing to reduce their gross emissions, countries and regions needing to reduce their emissions growth rates, and countries that can maintain the current emissions growth rates. Based on this proposal, most G8 countries by 2.05 had already expended their 2.50 emissions allowances. The accu-mulated financial value based on emissions has reached more than 5.5 trillion US dollars (2. dollars per ton of CO2.. Even if these countries could achieve their ambitious emissions reduction targets in the future, their per capita emissions from 2.06 to 2.50 would still be much higher than those of developing coun

关键词： international negotiations on climate change cumulative emissions per capita emission allowance

来源：

维普期刊数据库

同方期刊数据库评论

在线全文

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

On the major proposals for carbon emission reduction and some related issues

引用

Science china Earth sciences 2010年第12期53卷 159-172页

作者： ding zhongli1,duan {2.{3. quansheng3.& zhang zhiqiang4 1 CAS Key Lab of Cenozoic {3.ology and Environment,institute of {3.ology and geophysics,Chinese academy of {12.,{13. 10002.,china 2.The {3.neral Office of Chinese academy of {12.,{13. 100864,china 3.institute of {3.ographic {12. and Natural Resources Research,Chinese academy of {12.,{13. 100101,china 4 The Lanzhou Branch of the National Science Library,Scientific Information Center for Resources and Environment of CAS,Lanzhou 73.000,china CAS Key Lab of Cenozoic geology and Environment Institute of Geology and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China The general Office of Chinese academy of {2. Beijing China institute of geographic {2. and Natural Resources Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China The Lanzhou Branch of the National Science Library Scientific Information Center for Resources and Environment of CAS Lanzhou China

We evaluated and ran simulations for seven proposals for the reduction of global CO2.emissions (e.g.,those of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),United Nations Development Program,and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).All the proposals ignored the fact that the cumulative CO2.emissions per capita for developed countries were 7.54 times those for developing countries in the historical period of *** proposals further deliberately allocate 2.06-2.50 emission quotas to developed countries that are 2.3.6.7 times those to developing *** will seriously violate the development rights of developing *** paper clearly states that proposals such as that of the IPCC are not suitable references for future international climate change negotiations as they violate the fundamentals of fairness and equity in international relationships and the UNFCCC principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities".Comparing estimates of emissions in{2. in the scenario of rapid development with low-CO2.emission technology in the period 2.06-2.50 with estimates for other countries and groups,we find that{2. can logically and morally argue for equivalent emission rights even in the case of the strict CO2.concentration target of 450-470 ppmv.

关键词： CO2 emission reduction cumulative CO2 emission per capita emission rights

来源：

维普期刊数据库

同方期刊数据库评论

在线全文

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

On the major proposals for carbon emission reduction and some related issues

On the major proposals for carbon emission reduction and som...

引用

中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所第十届(2.10年度)学术年会

作者： ding zhongli~(1*),duan {3.~2,ge quansheng~3.& zhang zhiqiang~4 1 CAS Key Lab of Cenozoic geology and Environment,institute of geology and geophysics,Chinese academy of {13.,beijing 10002., china 2 The general Office of Chinese academy of {13.,beijing 100864,china 3.institute of geographic {13. and Natural Resources Research,Chinese academy of {13.,beijing 100101,china 4 The Lanzhou Branch of the National Science Library,Scientific Information Center for Resources and Environment of CAS,Lanzhou 73.000, china

We evaluated and ran simulations for seven proposals for the reduction of global CO emissions(e.g.,those of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC),United Nations Development Program,and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).All the proposals ignored the fact that the cumulative CO emissions per capita for developed countries were 7.54 times those for developing countries in the historical period of *** proposals further deliberately allocate 2.06-2.50 emission quotas to developed countries that are 2.3.6.7 times those to developing *** will seriously violate the development rights of developing *** paper clearly states that proposals such as that of the IPCC are not suitable references for future international climate change negotiations as they violate the fundamentals of fairness and equity in international relationships and the UNFCCC principle of"common but differentiated responsibilities".Comparing estimates of emissions in{2. in the scenario of rapid development with low-CO-emission technology in the period 2.06-2.50 with estimates for other countries and groups,we find that{2. can logically and morally argue for equivalent emission rights even in the case of the strict CO concentration target of 450-470 ppmv.

关键词： CO2.emission reduction cumulative CO2.emission per capita emission rights

来源： cnki会议评论

在线全文

cnki会议

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：