On the major proposals for carbon emission reduction and some related issues

作     者：DING ZhongLi1,DUAN XiaoNan2,GE QuanSheng3 & ZHANG ZhiQiang4 1 CAS Key Lab of Cenozoic Geology and Environment,Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China 2 The General Office of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100864,China 3 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China 4 The Lanzhou Branch of the National Science Library,Scientific Information Center for Resources and Environment of CAS,Lanzhou 730000,China 

作者机构：CAS Key Lab of Cenozoic Geology and Environment Institute of Geology and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China The General Office of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China The Lanzhou Branch of the National Science Library Scientific Information Center for Resources and Environment of CAS Lanzhou China 

出 版 物：《Science China Earth Sciences》 (中国科学（地球科学英文版）)

年 卷 期：2010年第53卷第12期

页      面：159-172页

核心收录：

学科分类：07[理学] 070601[理学-气象学] 0708[理学-地球物理学] 0706[理学-大气科学] 0704[理学-天文学] 

基　　金：supported by Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No.KZCX-YW-Q1-10) 

主　　题：CO2 emission reduction cumulative CO2 emission per capita emission rights 

摘      要：We evaluated and ran simulations for seven proposals for the reduction of global CO2 emissions (e.g.,those of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),United Nations Development Program,and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).All the proposals ignored the fact that the cumulative CO2 emissions per capita for developed countries were 7.54 times those for developing countries in the historical period of *** proposals further deliberately allocate 2006-2050 emission quotas to developed countries that are 2.3-6.7 times those to developing *** will seriously violate the development rights of developing *** paper clearly states that proposals such as that of the IPCC are not suitable references for future international climate change negotiations as they violate the fundamentals of fairness and equity in international relationships and the UNFCCC principle of common but differentiated responsibilities.Comparing estimates of emissions in China in the scenario of rapid development with low-CO2-emission technology in the period 2006-2050 with estimates for other countries and groups,we find that China can logically and morally argue for equivalent emission rights even in the case of the strict CO2 concentration target of 450-470 ppmv.