咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >A mixed-studies systematic rev... 收藏

A mixed-studies systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to promote physical activity and/or reduce sedentary time in children

A mixed-studies systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to promote physical activity and/or reduce sedentary time in children

作     者:Michelle Jones Emmanuel Defever Ayland Letsinger James Steele Kelly A Mackintosh Michelle Jones;Emmanuel Defever;Ayland Letsinger;James Steele;Kelly A Mackintosh

作者机构:Research OfficePlymouth Marjon UniversityPlymouth PL48AAUK School of SportHealth and Social SciencesSolent UniversitySouthamptonSO14 OYNUK Department of Health and KinesiologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTX 77843USA The ukactive Research InstituteLondonWC1R 4HEUK Applied Sports ScienceSwansea UniversitySwanseaSA28PPUK 

出 版 物:《Journal of Sport and Health Science》 (运动与健康科学(英文))

年 卷 期:2020年第9卷第1期

页      面:3-17,102页

核心收录:

学科分类:0401[教育学-教育学] 04[教育学] 

主  题:Children Intervention Physical activity School Sedentary time 

摘      要:Purpose:The aim of this mixed-studies systematic review was to ascertain the effectiveness of school-based interventions in increasing physical activity(PA) and/or reducing sedentary time(ST) in children aged 5-11 years,as well as to explore their effectiveness in relation to categories of the theory of expanded,extended,and enhanced opportunity(TEO).Methods:Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA) guidelines,5 databases were searched using predefined search *** title and abstract screening of 1115 records,the removal of duplicates(n=584) and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria agreed to a priori(n=419) resulted in 112 records that were full-text *** independent reviewers subsequently used the mixed-methods appraisal tool to assess the methodological quality of 57 full-text studies that met the inclusion criteria after full-text *** interventions were summarised using the TIDierR checklist and *** strength of evidence was determined using a 5-level rating system utilising a published decision ***:Overall evidence ratings for interventions implemented within school settings were:no evidence of effects on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity(MVPA) and inconclusive evidence of effects on sedentary *** relation to the TEO,expansion of PA appeared to be the most promising intervention type for MVPA,with moderate evidence of effect,whereas extension and enhancement of PA opportunity demonstrated no evidence of effect.A critical issue of possible compensatory behavior was identified by analysis of intervention effect in relation to PA measurement duration;when studies measured changes in PA during the actual intervention,there was moderate evidence of effect,whereas those that measured changes in PA during the school day presented inconclusive evidence of effect,and those that measured changes in PA over a whole day yielded no evidence of *** meta-analys

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分