咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Which Proof We Have against Co... 收藏

Which Proof We Have against Continuous Trajectories for Particles?

Which Proof We Have against Continuous Trajectories for Particles?

作     者:Sofia Wechsler 

作者机构:Kyriat Motzkin Israel 

出 版 物:《Journal of Modern Physics》 (现代物理(英文))

年 卷 期:2017年第8卷第1期

页      面:68-81页

学科分类:07[理学] 0701[理学-数学] 070101[理学-基础数学] 

主  题:101 Property Bosonic Singlet Continuous Trajectories Nonlocality Relativity Theory 

摘      要:It is in general accepted that the concept of continuous trajectories for particles is at odds with the relativistic quantum mechanics. Namely, when examining the evolution of entangled quantum objects according to frames of coordinates in relative move-ment, one gets contradictory trajectories. Such a situation is typically derived from the famous “Hardy’s paradox. However, it is argued here that if the rationale ignores the principle of quantum contextuality, as happens typically when using Hardy’s thought-experiment, the conclusion—rejection of the assumption of trajectories—is questionable. The issue is exemplified by an additional example: the 101 property of spin 1 bosons implies conflicting trajectories when the singlet state of two such bosons is examined according to frames in relative movement. It is concluded here that in the absence of a rationale which doesn’t violate the quantum contextuality, there are no sufficient arguments for refuting the possibility of a substructure of the quantum mechanics, consisting in particles following continuous trajectories.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分