咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Calibrating Vegetation Cover a... 收藏

Calibrating Vegetation Cover and Grassland Pollen Assemblages in the Flint Hills of Kansas, USA

Calibrating Vegetation Cover and Grassland Pollen Assemblages in the Flint Hills of Kansas, USA

作     者:Julie L. Commerford Kendra K. McLauchlan Shinya Sugita 

作者机构:Department of Geography Kansas State University Manhattan USA Department of Geography Kansas State University Manhattan USA Institute of Ecology Tallinn University Tallinn Estonia. 

出 版 物:《American Journal of Plant Sciences》 (美国植物学期刊(英文))

年 卷 期:2013年第4卷第7期

页      面:1-10页

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100214[医学-肿瘤学] 10[医学] 

主  题:Grassland Pollen Prairie North America Paleoecology 

摘      要:Grassland cover and composition respond to climate and have undoubtedly changed during the Holocene, but quantitative reconstructions from fossil pollen have been vague about spatial scale and taxon-specific cover. Here, we estimate the relevant source area of pollen for sedimentary basins approximately 50 m in radius, and we report pollen productivity estimates for 12 plant taxa in the tallgrass prairies of central North America. Both relevant source area of pollen and pollen productivity estimates were calculated via the Extended R-Value Model. To obtain these estimates, we collected and quantified the pollen found in surface sediment samples from 24 ponds across the study area. Vegetation was surveyed in the field in a 100 m radius around each pond, and vegetation maps from the Kansas Gap Analysis Project (GAP) were used to a radius of 2 km. Pollen fall speeds were calculated according to Stoke’s Law. Pollen assemblages from basins approximately 50 m in radius have a relevant source area of 1060 m in this grassland landscape. Pollen productivity estimates range from 0.02 to over 30 among the 12 taxa: Artemisia, Ambrosia, Asteraceae, Chenopodiaceae, Cornus, Fabaceae, Juniperus, Maclura, Poaceae, Populus, Quercus, and Salix. Woody taxa generally have higher pollen productivity than herbaceous taxa (except for Chenopodiaceae and Ambrosia).

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分