Complex posttraumatic stress disorder: The need to consolidate a distinct clinical syndrome or to reevaluate features of psychiatric disorders following interpersona trauma?
Complex posttraumatic stress disorder: The need to consolidate a distinct clinical syndrome or to reevaluate features of psychiatric disorders following interpersona trauma?作者机构:Department of Psychiatry School of Medicine University of Patras Department of Public Health School of Medicine University of Patras Specialist Care Team Limited School of MedicineUniversity of Patras
出 版 物:《World Journal of Psychiatry》 (世界精神病学杂志)
年 卷 期:2018年第8卷第1期
页 面:12-19页
核心收录:
学科分类:10[医学]
主 题:Complex posttraumatic stress disorder Posttraumatic stress disorder Borderline personality disorder Trauma Complex trauma
摘 要:Complex posttraumatic stress disorder(Complex PTSD)has been recently proposed as a distinct clinical entity in the WHO International Classification of Diseases,11^(th) version, due to be published, two decades after its first initiation. It is described as an enhanced version of the current definition of PTSD, with clinical features of PTSD plus three additional clusters of symptoms namely emotional dysregulation, negative self-cognitions and interpersonal hardship, thus resembling the clinical features commonly encountered in borderline personality disorder(BPD). Complex PTSD is related to complex trauma which is defined by its threatening and entrapping context, generally interpersonal in nature. In this manuscript, we review the current findings related to traumatic events predisposing the above-mentioned disorders as well as the biological correlates surrounding them, along with their clinical features. Furthermore, we suggest that besides the present distinct clinical diagnoses(PTSD; Complex PTSD; BPD), there is a cluster of these comorbid disorders, that follow a continuum of trauma and biological severity on a spectrum of common or similar clinical features and should be treated as such. More studies are needed to confirm or reject this hypothesis, particularly in clinical terms and how they correlate to clinical entities biological background, endorsing a shift from the phenomenologically only classification of psychiatric disorders towards a more biologically validated classification.