Lobar lung transplantation from deceased donors: A systematic review

作     者：Michael Eberlein Robert M Reed Mayy Chahla Servet Bolukbas Amy Blevins Dirk Van Raemdonck Alessia Stanzi Ilhan Inci Silvana Marasco Norihisa Shigemura Clemens Aigner Tobias Deuse 

作者机构：Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Occupational Medicine University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Department of Medicine University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine University of Maryland Department of Thoracic Surgery Helios Klinikum Wuppertal - University Hospital Witten/Herdecke Hardin Library for the Health Sciences University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit University Hospitals Leuven Department of Thoracic Surgery Zurich University Hospital Cardiothoracic Surgery Unit The Alfred Hospital Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Department of Thoracic Surgery Medical University of Vienna Department of Thoracic Surgery and Surgical Endoscopy Ruhrlandklinik University Clinic Essen Tueschener Weg Department of Cardiovascular Surgery University Heart Center Hamburg 

出 版 物：《World Journal of Transplantation》 (世界移植杂志)

年 卷 期：2017年第7卷第1期

页      面：70-80页

学科分类：10[医学] 

基　　金：the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI) 

主　　题：Lobar lung transplantation from deceased donors Cadaveric lobar lung transplantation Lung size matching Primary graft dysfunction Survival 

摘      要：AIM To systematically review reports on deceased-donor-lobar lung transplantation(dd LLTx) and uniformly describe sizematching using the donor-to-recipient predicted-total lung-capacity(pT LC) ratio. METHODS We set out to systematically review reports on ddL LTx and uniformly describe size matching using the donorto-recipient pT LC ratio and to summarize reported oneyear survival data of ddL LTx and conventional-LTx. We searched in Pub Med, CINAHL via EBSCO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Wiley(CDSR),Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects via Wiley(DARE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via Wiley(CENTRAL), Scopus(which includes EMBASE abstracts), and Web of Science for original reports on ddL LTx. RESULTS Nine observational cohort studies reporting on 301 ddL LTx met our inclusion criteria for systematic review of size matching, and eight for describing one-year-survival. The dd LLTx-group was often characterized by high acuity;however there was heterogeneity in transplant indications and pre-operative characteristics between studies. Data to calculate the pT LC ratio was available for 242 ddL LTx(80%). The mean pT LCratio before lobar resection was1.25 ± 0.3 and the transplanted pT LCratio after lobar resection was 0.76 ± 0.2. One-year survival in the ddL LTxgroup ranged from 50%-100%, compared to 72%-88%in the conventional-LTx group. In the largest study ddL LTx(n = 138) was associated with a lower one-year-survival compared to conventional-LTx(n = 539)(65.1% vs84.1%, P 0.001). CONCLUSION Further investigations of optimal donor-to-recipient size matching parameters for ddL LTx could improve outcomes of this important surgical option.