咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Correlation between the Childh... 收藏

Correlation between the Childhood-Asthma Control Test and the Criterion for Clinical Asthma Control

Correlation between the Childhood-Asthma Control Test and the Criterion for Clinical Asthma Control

作     者:Carlos José Ortiz-Lizcano Jürg Niederbacher-Velásquez Luis Alfonso Díaz-Martínez Carlos José Ortiz-Lizcano;Jürg Niederbacher-Velásquez;Luis Alfonso Díaz-Martínez

作者机构:Paidós Research Group Pediatrics Department School of Medicine Universidad Industrial de Santander Bucaramanga Colombia 

出 版 物:《Health》 (健康(英文))

年 卷 期:2016年第8卷第7期

页      面:623-629页

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100201[医学-内科学(含:心血管病、血液病、呼吸系病、消化系病、内分泌与代谢病、肾病、风湿病、传染病)] 10[医学] 

主  题:Asthma Treatment Control Evaluation Childhood-Asthma Control Test 

摘      要:Setting: Three pediatric pneumatologist offices in Bucaramanga, Colombia. Objective: To establish the concordance between medical criteria and the Childhood-Asthma Control Test (cACT). Design: Study of the assessment of diagnostic technology using transverse sampling. 127 asthma patients aged between 4 and 11 years and their parents filled before clinical evaluation made by a pediatric pneumologist. Patients were classified as controlled or not controlled. Criteria validity was established comparing this classification using Cohen’s kappa and performance indicators according to ROC analysis. Results: 78% of the patients were controlled;patients who are not controlled have a higher score in cACT (mean difference: 3.25 points). Concordance among cACT subscales is acceptable (ρ = 0.554). cACT’s sensitivity was 53.6%, specificity 78.8%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 2.53, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.59. The best cut-off point is 15, with 98% sensitivity, a specificity of 14.3%, LR+ in 1.14, and LR- in 0.14. Conclusions: cACT is a valid tool to determine asthma control in children without replacing medical criteria or other clinical tests. In populations with difficult access to high complexity services, it is useful to decide whether urgent referral to the specialist is necessary.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分