咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Numerical comparison of two mo... 收藏

Numerical comparison of two modes of gas-solid riser operation: Fluid catalytic cracking vs CFB combustor

Numerical comparison of two modes of gas-solid riser operation: Fluid catalytic cracking vs CFB combustor

作     者:Yifeng Mei Mingzhao Zhao Bona Lu Sheng Chen Wei Wang 

作者机构:Stare Key Laboratory afMultiphase Complex Systems Institute of Process Engineering Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 China School of Chemical Engineering Sichuan University Chengdu 610065 China Stare Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing China University of Petroleum Beijing 102249 China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 China 

出 版 物:《Particuology》 (颗粒学报(英文版))

年 卷 期:2017年第15卷第2期

页      面:42-48页

核心收录:

学科分类:07[理学] 

基  金:This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 91334204 and 21576263  the Chinese Academy of Sciences under Grant No. XDA07080100  and the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China under Grant No. 2012CB215003 

主  题:Fluidization Computational fluid dynamics Simulation Fluid catalytic cracking Circulating fluidized bed Choking 

摘      要:Two modes of gas-solid riser operation, i.e., fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) and circulating fluidized bed combustor (CFBC), have been recognized in literature; particularly in the understanding of choking phenomena. This work compares these two modes of operation through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. In CFD simulations, the different operations are represented by fixing appropriate boundary conditions: solids flux or solids inventory. It is found that the FCC and CFBC modes generally have the same dependence of solids flux on the mean solids volume fraction or solids inventory. However, during the choking transition, the FCC mode of operation needs more time to reach a steady state; thus the FCC system may have insufficient time to respond to valve adjustments or flow state change, leading to the choking. The difference between FCC and CFBC systems is more pronounced for the systems with longer risers. A more detailed investigation of these two modes of riser operation may require a three-dimensional full loop simulation with dynamic valve adjustment.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分