Comparison of Immune Responses against FMD by a DNA Vaccine Encoding the FMDV/O/IRN/2007 VP1 Gene and the Conventional Inactivated Vaccine in an Animal Model

作     者：Farahnaz Motamedi Sedeh Hoorieh Soleimanjahi AmirReza Jalilian Homayoon Mahravani 

作者机构：AgriculturalMedical and Industrial Research School Virology DepartmentFaculty of Medical ScienceTarbiat Modares University RaziVaccine and Serum Research Institute 

出 版 物：《Virologica Sinica》 (中国病毒学（英文版）)

年 卷 期：2012年第27卷第5期

页      面：286-291页

核心收录：

学科分类：090603[农学-临床兽医学] 09[农学] 0906[农学-兽医学] 

基　　金：Medical and Industrial Research Institute and Research Deputy of Tarbiat Modares University 

主　　题：DNA vaccine Foot-and-mouth disease virus Immune Response VP 1 gene 

摘      要：Foot-and-mouth disease virus （FMDV） is highly contagious and responsible for huge outbreaks among cloven hoofed animals. The aim of the present study is to evaluate a plasmid DNA immunization system that expresses the FMDV/OflRN/2007 VP1 gene and compare it with the conventional inactivated vaccine in an animal model. The VP1 gene was sub-cloned into the unique Kpn I and BamH I cloning sites of the peDNA3.1＋ and pEGFP-N1 vectors to construct the VPI gene cassettes. The transfected BHKT7 cells with sub-cloned pEGFP-N1-VP1 vector expressed GFP-VP1 fusion protein and displayed more green fluorescence spots than the transfected BHKT7 cells with pEGFP-N1 vector, which solely expressed the GFP protein. Six mice groups were respectively immunized by the sub-cloned pcDNA3.1＋-VP1 gene cassette as the DNA vaccine, DNA vaccine and PCMV-SPORT-GMCSF vector （as molecular adjuvant） together, conventional vaccine, PBS （as negative control）, pcDNA3.1＋ vector （as control group） and PCMV-SPORT vector that contained the GMCSF gene （as control group）. Significant neutralizing antibody responses were induced in the mice which were immunized using plasmid vectors expressing the VP1 and GMCSF genes together, the DNA vaccine alone and the conventional inactivated vaccine （P〈0.05）. Co-administration of DNA vaccine and GMCSF gene improved neutralizing antibody response in comparison with administration of the DNA vaccine alone, but this response was the most for the conventional vaccine group. However, induction of humeral immunity response in the conventional vaccine group was more protective than for the DNA vaccine, but T-cell proliferation and IFN-？ concentration were the most in DNA vaccine with the GMCSF gene. Therefore the group that was vaccinated by DNA vaccine with the GMCSF gene, showed protective neutralizing antibody response and the most Thl cellular immunity.