Introduction: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder of skeletal malformations and progressive extraskeletal ossification. Patients and Methods: In the present study, we pres...
详细信息
Introduction: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder of skeletal malformations and progressive extraskeletal ossification. Patients and Methods: In the present study, we present a case of FOP with marked progressive ossification of extraskeletal tissues. We investigated whether soluble factors in serum would affect the osteoblast phenotype by examining the effects of serum from this patient and control subjects on mouse osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Results: The clinical findings of this patient were compatible with FOP, and direct sequence analysis of genomic DNA demonstrated the presence of a heterozygous 617G> A (R206H) mutation of activin type 1 receptor (ACVR1). Serum from the FOP patient enhanced the level of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in Western blotting, compared with serum from the control, in MC3T3-E1 cells. Moreover, serum from the FOP patient enhanced the levels of ALP, osteocalcin and bone morphogenetic protein-2 mRNA in these cells. Conclusion: We presented a case of FOP with progressive ossification in extra-skeletal tissues with ACVR1 mutation. The present data suggest that the serum from this patient includes some soluble factors, which might enhance the osteoblast differentiation and BMP-2 expression in mouse osteoblastic cells.
AIM: To compare the clinical efficacy of the secondgeneration H2 RA lafutidine with that of lansoprazole in Japanese patients with mild gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD). METHODS: Patients with symptoms of GERD an...
详细信息
AIM: To compare the clinical efficacy of the secondgeneration H2 RA lafutidine with that of lansoprazole in Japanese patients with mild gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD). METHODS: Patients with symptoms of GERD and a diagnosis of grade A reflux esophagitis(according to the Los Angeles classification) were randomized to receive lafutidine(10 mg, twice daily) or lansoprazole(30 mg, once daily) for an initial 8 wk, followed by maintenance treatment comprising half-doses of the assigned drug for 24 wk. The primary endpoint was the frequency and severity of heartburn during initial and maintenance treatment. The secondary endpoints were the sum score of questions 2 and 3 in the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale(GSRS), and the satisfaction ***: Between April 2012 and March 2013, a total of 53 patients were enrolled, of whom 24 and 29 received lafutidine and lansoprazole, respectively. After 8 wk, the frequency and severity of heartburn was significantly reduced in both groups. However, lafutidine was significantly inferior to lansoprazole with regard to the severity of heartburn during initial and maintenance treatment(P = 0.016). The sum score of questions 2 and 3 in the GSRS, and satisfaction scores were also significantly worse in the lafutidine group than the lansoprazole group(P = 0.0068 and P = 0.0048, respectively).CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy of lafutidine was inferior to that of lansoprazole, even in Japanese patients with mild GERD.
暂无评论