检索结果-南通市图书馆

Bibliometrics： tracking research impact by selecting Lhe appropriate metrics

Asian Journal of Andrology 2016年第2期18卷 296-309,J0008页

作者： Ashok Agarwal Damayanthi Durairajanayagam Sindhuja Tatagari Sandro C Esteves Avi Harlev Ralf Henkel Shubhadeep Roychoudhury Sheryl Homa Nicolas Garrido Puchalt Ranjith Ramasamy Ahmad Majzoub Kim Dao Ly Eva Tvrda Mourad Assidi Kavindra Kesai Reecha Sharma Saleem Banihani Edmund Ko Muhammad Abu-Elmagd Jaime Gosalvez Asher Bashiri American Center for Reproductive Medicine Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA Faculty of Medicine Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor Malaysia Case Western Reserve University Cleveland OH USA Androfert Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic Campinas Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Soroka University Medical Center Ben Gurion University of the Negev Beersheba Israel Department of Medical Bioscience University of the Western Cape Bellville South Africa Department of Life Science and Bioinformatics Assam University Silchar Assam India Andrology Solutions London UK IVF Laboratory Instituto Universitario IVI Valencia Valencia Spain Department of Urology Unwersity of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA Texas A and M Health Science Center College of Medicine Bryan Texas USA Department of Animal Physiology Slovak University of Agricuiture Nitra Siovakia Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research King Abdulaziz University Jeddah KSA School of Life Sciences Jaipur National UnJversity Jaipur Rajasthan India Department of Health Services Saint Joseph's University Philadelphia PA USA Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences Jordan university of science and Technology Irbid Jordan Department of Urology Loma Linda University School of Medicine Loma Linda California USA Department of Biology Genetics Unit Autonomous University of Madrid MadridSpain Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Ultrasound Soroka University Medical Center Ben-Gurion University of the NegevBeersheba Israel.

traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publishes in peer-reviewed, indexed, high impact journals. This essential yardstick, often referred to as the impact of a specific researcher, is assessed through the use of various metrics. While researchers may be acquainted with such matrices, many do not know how to use them to enhance their careers. In addition to these metrics, a number of other factors should be taken into consideration to objectively evaluate a scientist＇s profile as a researcher and academician. Moreover, each metric has its own limitations that need to be considered when selecting an appropriate metric for evaluation. This paper provides a broad overview of the wide array of metrics currently in use in academia and research. Popular metrics are discussed and defined, including traditional metrics and article-level metrics, some of which are applied to researchers for a greater understanding of a particular concept, including varicocete that is the thematic area of this Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology. We recommend the combined use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation using judiciously selected metrics for a more objective assessment of scholarly output and research impact.

关键词： article-level metrics bibliometrics citation counts h-index impact factor research databases research impact research productivity traditional metrics

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：