Background:The efficacy and safety of opicapone,a once-daily catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor,have been established in two large randomized,placebo-controlled,multinational pivotal ***,clinical evidence from rou...
详细信息
Background:The efficacy and safety of opicapone,a once-daily catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor,have been established in two large randomized,placebo-controlled,multinational pivotal ***,clinical evidence from routine practice is needed to complement the data from the pivotal ***:OPTIPARK(NCT02847442)was a prospective,open-label,single-arm trial conducted in Germany and the UK under clinical practice *** with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations were treated with opicapone 50 mg for 3(Germany)or 6(UK)months in addition to their current levodopa and other antiparkinsonian *** primary endpoint was the Clinician’s Global Impression of Change(CGI-C)after 3 *** assessments included Patient Global Impressions of Change(PGI-C),the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale(UPDRS),Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire(PDQ-8),and the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale(NMSS).Safety assessments included evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events(TEAEs)and serious adverse events(SAEs).Results:Of the 506 patients enrolled,495(97.8%)took at least one dose of *** these,393(79.4%)patients completed 3 months of ***,71.3 and 76.9%of patients experienced any improvement on CGI-C and PGI-C after 3 months,respectively(full analysis set).At 6 months,for UK subgroup only(n=95),85.3%of patients were judged by investigators as improved since commencing *** scores at 3 months showed statistically significant improvements in activities of daily living during OFF(mean±SD change from baseline:?3.0±4.6,p<0.0001)and motor scores during ON(?4.6±8.1,p<0.0001).The mean±SD improvements of?3.4±12.8 points for PDQ-8 and-6.8±19.7 points for NMSS were statistically significant versus baseline(both p<0.0001).Most of TEAEs(94.8%of events)were of mild or moderate *** considered to be at least possibly related to opicapone were reported for 45.1%of patients,with dyskinesia(11.5%)and dry mouth(6.5%)being
Objective: To estimate the rate of response to divalproex sodium extended release in pediatric bipolar spectrum disorder in young children age 6 - 12. Methods: This was an 8-week, open-label treatment of youth with DS...
详细信息
Objective: To estimate the rate of response to divalproex sodium extended release in pediatric bipolar spectrum disorder in young children age 6 - 12. Methods: This was an 8-week, open-label treatment of youth with DSM-IV bipolar disorder with divalproex sodium extended release (ER) monotherapy. Severity of mania was assessed weekly with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Results: The sample was 8.9 ± 2.0 years of age and predominantly male (83%). At study entry the mean YMRS score was 26.3 ± 4.5. Of the 18 subjects enrolled, 7 (39%) completed the 8 week course. We failed to find a clinically or statistically significant improvement with divalproex sodium ER. Pre-post comparisons at endpoint (LOCF) indicated an average response reduction of 6.1 ± 2.6 in the YMRS to a mean of 20.3 ± 8.1. Weight increased by 1.36 ± 0.7 kg (p = 0.08) from baseline to endpoint. Conclusion. Divalproex sodium ER monotherapy was associated with poor tolerability, was associated with clinically concerning weight gain but had modest therapeutic benefits in the management of symptoms of mania and depression in children with pediatric bipolar disorder.
Background:The benefit of systemic treatments in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC)which has pro-gressed after chemotherapy is still uncertain and optimal regimens based on randomized trials have not yet been **...
详细信息
Background:The benefit of systemic treatments in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC)which has pro-gressed after chemotherapy is still uncertain and optimal regimens based on randomized trials have not yet been *** aimed to compare the efficacy of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 monotherapy in recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients who had resistance to platinum-or taxane-based ***:We conducted a prospective randomized,multicenter,open-label,phase 3 trial in 15 centers across *** patients were adults with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic ESCC,and were randomly assigned(ratio,1:1)to receive either irinotecan plus S-1(intravenous infusion of irinotecan[160 mg/m2]on day 1 and oral S-1[80-120 mg]on days 1-10,repeated every 14 days)or oral S-1 monotherapy(80-120 mg/day on days 1-14,repeated every 21 days)using a central computerized minimization *** primary endpoint was progression-free survival(PFS).Results:Between December 23,2014 and July 25,2016,we screened 148 patients and randomly assigned 123 patients to receive either irinotecan plus S-1 regimen(n=61)or S-1 monotherapy(n=62).After a median follow-up of 29.2 months(95%confidence interval[CI]17.5-40.9 months),the median PFS was significantly longer in the irinotecan plus S-1 group than in the S-1 monotherapy group(3.8 months[95%CI 2.9-4.3 months]vs.1.7 months[95%CI 1.4-2.7 months],hazard ratio=0.58,95%CI 0.38-0.86,P=0.006).The objective response rates were 24.6%in the irinotecan plus S-1 group and 9.7%in the S-1 monotherapy group(P=0.002).The patients in the irinotecan plus S-1 group presented with increased rates of grade 3-4 leukopenia(16.4%vs.0%),neutropenia(14.8%vs.1.6%),and nausea(4.9%vs.0%).No significant difference in grade 3-4 diarrhea and no treatment-related deaths were observed in both ***: The combination of irinotecan with S-1 was similarly tolerable but significantly prolonged PFS compared to S-1 monotherapy as a second- o
暂无评论