检索结果-南通市图书馆

The Ame2020 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, and adjustment procedures

Chinese Physics C 2021年第3期45卷 181-522页

作者： W.J.Huang Meng Wang F.G.Kondev G.Audi S.Naimi Institute of Modern Physics Chinese Academy of SciencesLanzhou 730000China Advanced Energy Science and Technology Guangdong Laboratory Huizhou 516003China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100084China Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik Saupfercheckweg 169117 HeidelbergGermany School of Nuclear Science and Technology University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing 100049China Physics Division Argonne National LaboratoryLemontIL 60439USA RIKEN Nishina Center WakoSaitama 351-0198Japan

This is the first of two articles(Part I and Part II)that presents the results of the new atomic mass evaluation,*** includes complete information on the experimental input data that were used to derive the tables of recommended values which are given in Part *** article describes the evaluation philosophy and procedures that were implemented in the selection of specific nuclear reaction,decay and mass-spectrometric data which were used in a least-squares fit adjustment in order to determine the recommended mass values and their *** input data,including both the accepted and rejected ones,are tabulated and compared with the adjusted values obtained from the least-squares fit *** with the previous Ame2016 evaluation are discussed and specific examples are presented for several nuclides that may be of interest to Ame users.

关键词： atomic mass evaluation mass spectrometry nuclear decays nuclear reactions least-squares adjustment trends from the mass surface(TMS) atomic-mass tables

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (Ⅰ).Evaluation of input data;and adjustment procedures

引用

Chinese Physics C 2017年第3期41卷 141-484页

作者：黄文嘉欧乔治王猛 F.G.Kondev S.Naimi 徐星 CSNSM Univ Paris-Sud CNRS/IN2P3 Université Paris-Saclay Institute of Modern Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Joint Department for Nuclear Physics Institute of Modern Physics CAS and Lanzhou University Argonne National Laboratory RIKEN Nishina Center

This paper is the first of two articles(Part Ⅰ and Part Ⅱ) that presents the results of the new atomic mass evaluation,*** includes complete information on the experimental input data(also including unused and rejected ones),as well as details on the evaluation procedures used to derive the tables of recommended values given in the second *** article describes the evaluation philosophy and procedures that were implemented in the selection of specific nuclear reaction,decay and mass-spectrometric *** input values were entered in the least-squares adjustment for determining the best values for the atomic masses and their *** of the calculation and particularities of the AME are then *** accepted and rejected data,including outweighted ones,are presented in a tabular format and compared with the adjusted values obtained using the least-squares fit *** with the previous AME2012 evaluation are discussed and specific information is presented for several cases that may be of interest to AME *** second AME2016 article gives a table with the recommended values of atomic masses,as well as tables and graphs of derived quantities,along with the list of references used in both the AME2016 and the NUBASE2016 evaluations(the first paper in this issue).

关键词： AME trends from the mass surface(TMS) atomic-mass tables least-squares adjustment

来源：

同方期刊数据库评论

在线全文

同方期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation

引用

Chinese Physics C 2017年第3期41卷 139-480页

作者：黄文嘉欧乔治王猛 F.G. Kondev S. Naimi 徐星 CSNSM Univ Paris-Sud CNRS/IN2P3 Universite Paris-Saclay 91405 Orsay France Institute of Modern Physics Chinese Acaclemy of Sciences Lanzhou 730-000 People's -Republic of China Joint Department for Nuclear Physics Institute of Mo~tern Physics CAS and Lanzhou University Lanzhou 730000 China Argonne National Laboratory Argonne IL 60439 USA RIKEN Nishina Center Wakol Saitama 351-0198 Japan

This paper is the first of two articles （Part I and Part II） that presents the results of the new atomic mass evaluation, AME2016. It includes complete information on the experimental input data （also including unused and rejected ones）, as well as details on the evaluation procedures used to derive the tables of recommended values given in the second part. This article describes the evaluation philosophy and procedures that were implemented in the selection of specific nuclear reaction, decay and mass-spectrometric results. These input values were entered in the least-squares adjustment for determining the best values for the atomic masses and their uncertainties. Details of the calculation and particularities of the AME are then described. All accepted and rejected data, including outweighted ones, are presented in a tabular format and compared with the adjusted values obtained using the least-squares fit analysis. Differences with the previous AME2012 evaluation are discussed and specific information is presented for several cases that may be of interest to AME users. The second AME2016 article gives a table with the recommended values of atomic masses, as well as tables and graphs of derived quantities, along with the list of references used in both the AME2016 and the NUBASE2016 evaluations （the first paper in this issue）.

关键词： AME trends from the mass surface (TMS) atomic-mass tables least-squares adjustment

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：