检索结果-南通市图书馆

Patellar dislocation following Distal femoral replacement after extraarticular knee resection for bone sarcoma:A case report

引用

World Journal of Clinical Cases 2022年第11期10卷 3561-3572页

作者： Yuta Kubota Kazuhiro Tanaka Masashi Hirakawa Tatsuya Iwasaki Masanori Kawano Ichiro Itonaga Hiroshi Tsumura Orthopaedic Surgery Oita UniversityYufu City 879-5593OitaJapan

BACKGROUND For the treatment of bone sarcoma in the distal femur,wide-margin resection and knee reconstruction with tumor endoprosthesis are standard therapies.Extraarticular knee resection is required in cases of tumor invasion of the knee joint;however,the incidence of complications,such as aseptic loosening,prosthesis infection,and implant failure,is higher than that following intra-articular knee resection.To the best of our knowledge,there are three reports of patellar dislocations after replacement of a tumor endoprosthesis.CASE SUMMARY A 36-year-old man with no significant past medical history was admitted to our institution with continuous pain in his left knee for 4 mo.An open biopsy was performed,and the patient was diagnosed with a left distal femoral malignant bone tumor.Extra-articular knee resection and knee reconstruction with a tumor endoprosthesis were performed.Although the alignment of the tumor prosthesis was acceptable,knee instability was noticed postoperatively.The axial radiographic view of the patellar and computed tomography showed lateral patellar dislocation at 4 wk postoperatively.The patient had to undergo a lateral release and proximal realignment.He could perform his daily activities at 9 mo postoperatively.Radiography revealed no patellar re-dislocation.CONCLUSION Proximal realignment may be considered during primary surgery if there is an imbalance in the forces controlling the patellar tracking.

关键词： Bone tumor Distal femoral replacement Lateral release Patellar dislocation Proximal realignment Case report

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Clinical outcomes of cemented distal femur replacements with allpolyethylene tibial components for oncologic indications

引用

World Journal of Orthopedics 2023年第4期14卷 218-230页

作者： Alexander B Christ Brian C Chung Matthew Urness Lucas W Mayer Brandon S Gettleman Nathanael DHeckmann Lawrence R Menendez Department of Orthopedic Surgery Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCA 90033United States University of South Carolina School of Medicine ColumbiaSC 29209United States

BACKGROUND Endoprosthetic Distal femoral replacement(DFR)is a well-established salvage procedure following resection of malignant tumors within the distal femur.Use of an all-polyethylene tibial(APT)component is cost-effective and avoids failure due to locking-mechanism issues and backside wear,but limits modularity and the option for late liner exchange.Due to a paucity of literature we sought to answer three questions:(1)What are the most common modes of implant failure for patients undergoing cemented DFR with APT for oncologic indications?(2)What is the survivorship,rate of all-cause reoperation,and rate of revision for aseptic loosening of these implants?And(3)Is there a difference in implant survivorship or patient demographics between cemented DFRs with APT performed as a primary reconstruction vs those performed as a revision procedure?AIM To assess outcomes of cemented DFRs with APT components used for oncologic indications.METHODS After Institutional Review Board approval,a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent DFR between December 2000 to September 2020 was performed using a single-institutional database.Inclusion criteria consisted of all patients who underwent DFR with a GMRS®(Global Modular replacement System,Stryker,Kalamazoo,MI,United States)cemented distal femoral endoprosthesis and APT component for an oncologic indication.Patients undergoing DFR for non-oncologic indications and patients with metal-backed tibial components were excluded.Implant failure was recorded using Henderson's classification and survivorship was reported using a competing risks analysis.RESULTS 55 DFRs(55 patients)with an average age of 50.9±20.7 years and average body mass index of 29.7±8.3 kg/m2 were followed for 38.8±54.9 mo(range 0.2-208.4).Of these,60.0%were female and 52.7%were white.The majority of DFRs with APT in this cohort were indicated for oncologic diagnoses of osteogenic sarcoma(n=22,40.0%),giant cell tumor(n=9,16.4%),and metastatic carcinoma(n=8,14.6%).DFR with APT implantation was per

关键词： Distal femoral replacement Modular Revision Dislocation Oncologic

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：