检索结果-南通市图书馆

Value of intravoxel incoherent motion in detecting and staging liver fibrosis: A meta-analysis

World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年第23期26卷 3304-3317页

作者： Zheng Ye Yi Wei Jie Chen Shan Yao Bin Song West China School of Medicine Sichuan UniversityChengdu 610041Sichuan ProvinceChina Department of Radiology West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengdu 610041Sichuan ProvinceChina

BACKGROUND Liver fibrosis(LF) is a common pathological feature of all chronic liver *** the accumulation of extracellular matrix in the fibrotic liver, true molecular water diffusion and perfusion-related diffusion are restricted. Intravoxel incoherent motion(IVIM) can capture the information on tissue diffusivity and microcapillary perfusion separately and reflect the fibrotic severity with diffusion *** To investigate the diagnostic performance of IVIM in detecting and staging LF with histology as a reference *** A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies on the diagnostic accuracy of IVIM for assessment of histologically proven LF. The stages of LF were classified as F0(no fibrosis), F1(portal fibrosis without septa),F2(periportal fibrosis with few septa), F3(septal fibrosis), and F4(cirrhosis)according to histopathological findings. Data were extracted to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio, as well as the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC) in each *** A total of 12 studies with 923 subjects were included in this meta-analysis with 5 studies(n = 465) for LF ≥ F1, 9 studies(n = 757) for LF ≥ F2, 4 studies(n = 413) for LF ≥ F3, and 6 studies(n = 562) for LF = F4. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated to be 0.78(95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.82) and 0.81(0.74-0.86)for LF ≥ F1 detection with IVIM;0.82(0.79-0.86) and 0.80(0.75-0.84) for staging F2 fibrosis;0.85(0.79-0.90) and 0.83(0.77-0.87) for staging F3 fibrosis, and 0.90(0.84-0.94) and 0.75(0.70-0.79) for detecting F4 cirrhosis, respectively. The AUCs for LF≥ F1, F2, F3, F4 detection were 0.862(0.811-0.914), 0.883(0.856-0.909), 0.886(0.865-0.907), and 0.899(0.866-0.932), respectively. Moderate to substantial heterogeneity was observed with inconsistency index(I2) ranging from 0% to 77.9%. No publication bias was dete

关键词： Liver fibrosis Liver cirrhosis Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weight imaging diffusion magnetic resonance imaging Meta-analysis

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：