检索结果-南通市图书馆

CiteOpinion: Evidence-based Evaluation Tool for academic contributions of Research Papers Based on Citing Sentences

Journal of Data and Information Science 2019年第4期4卷 26-41页

作者： Xiaoqiu Le Jingdan Chu Siyi Deng Qihang Jiao Jingjing Pei Liya Zhu Junliang Yao National Science Library Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing 100190China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190China

Purpose:To uncover the evaluation information on the academic contribution of research papers cited by peers based on the content cited by citing papers,and to provide an evidencebased tool for evaluating the academic value of cited ***/methodology/approach:CiteOpinion uses a deep learning model to automatically extract citing sentences from representative citing papers;it starts with an analysis on the citing sentences,then it identifies major academic contribution points of the cited paper,positive/negative evaluations from citing authors and the changes in the subjects of subsequent citing authors by means of Recognizing Categories of Moves(problems,methods,conclusions,etc.),and sentiment analysis and topic ***:Citing sentences in a citing paper contain substantial evidences useful for academic *** can also be used to objectively and authentically reveal the nature and degree of contribution of the cited paper reflected by citation,beyond simple citation *** implications:The evidence-based evaluation tool CiteOpinion can provide an objective and in-depth academic value evaluation basis for the representative papers of scientific researchers,research teams,and ***/value:No other similar practical tool is found in papers *** limitations:There are difficulties in acquiring full text of citing *** is a need to refine the calculation based on the sentiment scores of citing ***,the tool is only used for academic contribution evaluation,while its value in policy studies,technical application,and promotion of science is not yet tested.

关键词： Cited paper Citing paper Citing sentence Citation motive Citation sentiment academic contribution Evaluation

来源：

维普期刊数据库

同方期刊数据库评论

在线全文

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

A Novel Metric for Assessing National Strength in Scientific Research:Understanding China’s Research Output in Quantum Technology through Collaboration

引用

Journal of Data and Information Science 2022年第4期7卷 39-60页

作者： Yuqi Wang Yue Chen Zhiqi Wang Kang Wang Kai Song WISE Lab Institute of Science of Science and S&T managementDalian University of TechnologyDalian 116024China

Purpose:The 5th Plenary Session of the 19th Communist Party of China(CPC)Central Committee clearly states that developing science and technology through self-reliance and self-strengthening provides the strategic underpinning for China’s *** on this background,this paper explores a metric model for assessing national scientific research strength through collaboration on research ***/methodology/approach:We propose a novel metric model for assessing national scientific research strength,which sets two indicators,national scientific self-reliance(SR)and national academic contribution(CT),to reflect“self-reliance”and“self-strengthening”*** the research papers in quantum technology as an example,this study analyzes the scientific research strength of various countries around the world,especially China in quantum ***:The results show that the research of quantum technology in China has always been relatively independent with fewer international collaboration papers and located in a more marginal position in cooperation ***’s academic contribution(CT)to global quantum technology research is increasing and has been greater than that of the United States in *** the two indicators,CT and SR,China’s research strength in the quantum field closely follows the United States,and the United States is the most powerful with high research *** limitations:This paper only reflects China’s scientific research strength in quantum technology from collaboration on research papers and doesn’t consider the segmentation of quantum technology and the industrial upstream and downstream aspects,which need further *** implications:The model is helpful to better understand the national scientific research strength in a certain field from“self-reliance”and“self-strengthening”.ScienceOriginality/value:We propose a novel metric model to measure the national scientific research strength from the pe

关键词： National Scientific Research Strength academic contribution National Scientific Self-reliance Index Quantum Technology Research

来源：

维普期刊数据库

同方期刊数据库评论

在线全文

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

侯外庐在史学理论与学科建设上的贡献

引用

历史学 2017年第1期

作者：瞿林东

著名马克思主义史学家侯外庐先生以研究中国社会史、思想史、哲学史而闻名中外。在数十年的学术生涯中，他对史学理论和历史学学科建设发表了许多重要的论述，作出了杰出的贡献。他强调史学工作者在理论上和品质上的修养是极其重要的，... 详细信息

著名马克思主义史学家侯外庐先生以研究中国社会史、思想史、哲学史而闻名中外。在数十年的学术生涯中，他对史学理论和历史学学科建设发表了许多重要的论述，作出了杰出的贡献。他强调史学工作者在理论上和品质上的修养是极其重要的，这些修养包括马克思主义理论指导，科学上的诚实态度和执行自我批判的精神。关于历史研究的原则和方法，他认为，应该是搜集大量的材料，加以具体的分析和整理，经过概括和抽象，去粗取精、去伪存真、由此及彼、由表及里，发现事物内部的规律性，得出科学的结论。他还提出了历史科学“生长点”的问题，根据矛盾学说，指出，历史科学的发展，离不开批评，没有批评就不能发展。关于人才培养和教学改革，他提出了四条原则：一是熟处理，就是要趁热打铁；二是要注意文章、考核、义理；三是注意培养尖子，不能搞平均主义；四是发扬民主精神。他深入研究了马克思主义史学民族化的问题，提出：所谓“民族化”，就是要把中国丰富的历史资料，和马克思主义历史科学关于人类社会发展的规律，做统一的研究，从中总结出中国社会发展的规律和历史特点。这些思想都具有重要的指导意义，在当今的史学理论和学科建设上，仍有突出的参考价值。

关键词：侯外庐史学理论学科建设 Hou Wailu historiographic theory development of historical science academic contribution

来源：人大复印报刊资料评论

在线全文

人大复印报刊资料

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：