检索结果-南通市图书馆

The Flemish Performance-based Research Funding System: A Unique Variant of the Norwegian Model

在线全文

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Journal of Data and Information Science 2018年第4期3卷 45-60页

作者： Tim C.E.Engels raf guns Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM) Faculty of Social Science University of Antwerp

The BOF-key is the performance-based research funding system that is used in Flanders, Belgium. In this paper we describe the historical background of the system, its current design and organization, as well as its effects on the Flemish higher education landscape. The BOFkey in its current form relies on three bibliometric parameters: publications in Web of Science, citations in Web of Science, and publications in a comprehensive regional database for SSH publications. Taken together, the BOF-key forms a unique variant of the Norwegian model: while the system to a large extent relies on a commercial database, it avoids the problem of inadequate coverage of the SSH. Because the bibliometric parameters of the BOF-key are reused in other funding allocation schemes, their overall importance to the Flemish universities is substantial.

关键词： Performance-based research funding systems Flanders(Belgium) Norwegian model Web of Science VABB-SHW

Unnormalized and normalized forms of gefura measures in directed and undirected networks

在线全文

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 2015年第4期16卷 311-320页

作者： raf guns Ronald ROUSSEAU Institute for Education and lnformation Sciences University of Antwerp Venusstraat 35 Antwerp B-2000 Belgium Department of Mathematics KU Leuven Celestijnenlaan 200B Leuven B-3001 Belgium

In some networks nodes belong to predefined groups （e.g., authors belong to institutions）. Common network cen- trality measures do not take this structure into account. Gefura measures are designed as indicators of a node＇s brokerage role between such groups. They are defined as variants of betweeuness centrality and consider to what extent a node belongs to shortest paths between nodes from different groups. In this article we make the following new contributions to their study：（1） We systematically study unnormalized gefura measures and show that, next to the ＇structural＇ normalization that has hitherto been applied, a ＇basic＇ normalization procedure is possible. While the former normalizes at the level of groups, the latter normalizes at the level of nodes. （2） Treating undirected networks as equivalent to symmetric directed networks, we expand the definition of gefura measures to the directed case. （3） It is shown how Brandes＇ algorithm for betweenness centrality can be adjusted to cover these cases.

关键词： Networks subdivided in groups Partitions Gefura measures Q-measures Brokerage role Directed and undirectednetworks Brandes' algorithm

National Lists of Scholarly Publication Channels: An Overview and Recommendations for Their Construction and Maintenance

在线全文

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Journal of Data and Information Science 2021年第1期6卷 50-86页

作者： Janne Pölönen raf guns Emanuel Kulczycki Gunnar Sivertsen Tim C.E.Engels Federation of Finnish Learned Societies Snellmaninkatu 1300170 HelsinkiFinland University of Antwerp Faculty of Social SciencesCentre for R&D Monitoring(ECOOM)Middelheimlaan 12020 AntwerpBelgium Adam Mickiewicz University Scholarly Communication Research GroupSzamarzewskiego 89c60-568 PoznańPoland Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation Research and Education(NIFU)P.O.Box 28150608 TøyenOsloNorway

Purpose: This paper presents an overview of different kinds of lists of scholarly publication channels and of experiences related to the construction and maintenance of national lists supporting performance-based research funding systems. It also contributes with a set of recommendations for the construction and maintenance of national lists of journals and book ***/methodology/approach: The study is based on analysis of previously published studies, policy papers, and reported experiences related to the construction and use of lists of scholarly publication channels. Findings: Several countries have systems for research funding and/or evaluation, that involve the use of national lists of scholarly publication channels(mainly journals and publishers). Typically, such lists are selective(do not include all scholarly or non-scholarly channels) and differentiated(distinguish between channels of different levels and quality). At the same time, most lists are embedded in a system that encompasses multiple or all disciplines. This raises the question how such lists can be organized and maintained to ensure that all relevant disciplines and all types of research are adequately represented. Research limitation: The conclusions and recommendations of the study are based on the authors' interpretation of a complex and sometimes controversial process with many different stakeholders *** implications: The recommendations and the related background information provided in this paper enable mutual learning that may feed into improvements in the construction and maintenance of national and other lists of scholarly publication channels in any geographical context. This may foster a development of responsible evaluation ***/value: This paper presents the first general overview and typology of different kinds of publication channel lists, provides insights on expert-based versus metrics-based evaluation, and formulates a set of recommend

关键词： Publication channel lists Research funding Scholarly communication Journal ranking

在线全文

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

概念视角下信息计量学的三个层面

图书馆理论与实践 2014年第9期 46-50页

作者： raf guns 王岗不详宁夏图书馆银川750011

简要回顾信息计量学研究内容的现行模型,并就模型的记录层面、社会层面、认知层面分别进行了讨论;在此基础上,讨论了每个层面内部以及层面之间的关系,并特别论述了引用关系的性质,研究了映射、距离远近以及影响等概念在该模型中的位置。

关键词：信息计量学文献计量学引用实体-关系模型概念模型信息信息检索