检索结果-南通市图书馆

Treatment-Plan Comparison of Three Advanced Radiation Treatment Modalities for Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy to the Head and Neck

引用

International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology 2019年第2期8卷 106-120页

作者： He Wang James N. Yang Xiaodong Zhang Jing Li Steven J. Frank Zhongxiang Zhao dershan luo Xiaorong Zhu Congjun Wang Samuel Tung Adam S. Garden David I. Rosenthal Clifton David Fuller Gary Brandon Gunn Amol J. Ghia Jay P. Reddy Shaan M. Raza Franco De Monte Mark S. Chambers Paul D. Brown Shirley Su Jack Phan Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA Department of Radiation Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA Department of Neurosurgery The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA Department of Oncologic Dentistry Prosthodontics Thoracic/Head &Neck Surgery The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA Department of Radiation Oncology The Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA

Purpose: Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (FSRS) can be given with at least three modalities: Gamma Knife, with the noninvasive frameless extend system (GKE);linear accelerator-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT);and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). We extracted treatment plans for patients who had received FSRS with GKE for recurrent skull base or intracranial tumors, created corresponding plans for VMAT and IMPT, and compared the quality of the three sets of plans. Methods and materials: Plans were extracted for 9 patients with recurrent malignant skull-base tumors (n = 6) or large intracranial tumors (n = 3) who had received FSRS with GKE (median dose 24 Gy in 3 fractions) in 2013 through 2015. Plans for VMAT were generated with a TrueBeam STx LINAC machine using 6-MV photons, and plans for IMPT were generated with multi-field optimization. The optimized VMAT and IMPT plans were normalized to achieve the best possible target coverage while meeting the same dose-volume constraints on organs at risk (OARs) as the GKE plans. Plans were evaluated on the basis of target coverage, conformity index, homogeneity index, gradient index, and treatment efficiency. Results: The median target volume was 10.2 cm3 (range 1.9 - 33.8 cm3). The VMAT and IMPT plans met all OAR constraints, and target coverage and conformity were comparable among all plans. VMAT and IMPT plans showed significantly better target uniformity and treatment delivery efficiency (P P Conclusion: FSRS for skull base and large intracranial lesions delivered by VMAT and IMPT can achieve comparable target coverage, conformity, and sparing of critical structure as the GKE while providing superior target uniformity and treatment delivery efficiency. The GKE had superior high-dose gradients outside the target and thus better protected surrounding normal structures.

关键词： Gamma Knife Extend System Stereotactic Radiosurgery Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Spot Scanning Proton Therapy

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：