检索结果-南通市图书馆

Orbital reconstruction:From simple materials to bioengineered solutions

Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2024年第2期6卷 98-105页

作者： Maria Cervatiuc Eldor Jonnazarov Doston Farhodovich Shukuraliev Mehrob Islomidinovich Yatimov Abdullo Hudoydodovich Bobobegov Sukhrobjon Solijonovich Tuychiev Husan Bahtiyorovich Juraev suhrob tulqinovich khidiraliev Makhmudjon Burhonovich Muratov Sherali Chorshanbeevich Uralov Dilshod Uralovich Yuldashov Muslihiddin Ahmadovich Rahimov Ruslan Usmonjonovich Ghoziev Idibek Shamsidinovich Mainusov Department of Oncology Radiotherapy and Plastic Surgery I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) Department of Ophthalmology I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) Avicenna Tajik State Medical University (ATSMU) Tajik National University (TNU) Pacific State Medical University (PSMU)

Orbital fractures are a frequent and serious problem for practicing ophthalmologists. The complexity of the pathology is explained by the combined nature of the injuries(often associated with craniofacial injuries), multistage treatments, results that are often unsatisfactory, and a wide range of complaints about functional and cosmetic limitations. Over the years, significant progress has been made in the field of orbital reconstruction,allowing the transition from traditional methods using simple materials to innovative bioengineering *** evolution has been driven by advances in surgical technologies, imaging techniques, and biomaterials aimed at optimizing the restoration of the shape and function of the orbital region. Traditional approaches are based on the use of autologous tissues such as bone grafts and muscle flaps, which provide biocompatibility and natural integration, but have limitations in terms of customization and accessibility. The advent of patient-specific implants and 3D printing technology has revolutionized the reconstruction of the orbit, allowing implants to be precisely adapted to a patient's anatomy. Biocompatible materials, such as porous polyethylene, titanium, and silicone, have become the basis for orbital reconstruction, ensuring durability and compatibility while minimizing long-term complications. Bioengineered solutions hold promise for further advancements in orbital reconstruction. We searched Pub Med, Cyberleninka, and other verified databases for published articles on orbital reconstruction reported in the literature between 1960 and January 2024. In this article, we consider the advantages and disadvantages of each category of reconstruction materials and provide up-to-date information on the methods for modifying their properties using modern processing technologies.

关键词： Orbital reconstruction Bioengineered solutions Biomaterials Patient-specific implants Minimally invasive surgery

来源：

同方期刊数据库评论

在线全文

同方期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：