检索结果-南通市图书馆

中国肺癌杂志 2022年第11期25卷 835-840页

作者： Hongsheng DENG Jun LIU Xiuyu CAI Jiawei CHEN Gaetano ROCCO rene' horsleben petersen Alessandro BRUNELLI Calvin S.H.NG Thomas A.D'AMICO Wenhua LIANG Jianxing HE 雷杰 Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health Department of General Internal Medicine Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine Department of Surgery Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University Hospital of CopenhagenRigshospitalet Department of Thoracic Surgery St. James's University Hospital Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of Surgery Prince of Wales Hospital the Chinese University of Hong Kong Division of Thoracic Surgery Department of Surgery Duke University Medical Center 空军军医大学第二附属医院胸腔外科

背景新辅助免疫治疗在局部晚期非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）的应用仍存在争议。因此，本研究旨在报道通过免疫联合化疗将初始不可切除c IIIB期NSCLC患者转化为根治性微创手术的系列病例，评估手术效果和术后的生... 详细信息

背景新辅助免疫治疗在局部晚期非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）的应用仍存在争议。因此，本研究旨在报道通过免疫联合化疗将初始不可切除c IIIB期NSCLC患者转化为根治性微创手术的系列病例，评估手术效果和术后的生存获益。方法回顾性分析2018年5月-2020年8月期间接受程序性细胞死亡受体1(programmed cell death-1,PD-1)抑制剂联合含铂双药化疗的51例c IIIB期NSCLC患者。收集入组患者手术相关数据和肿瘤相关数据。结果31例患者最终接受手术治疗，其中23例（74.2%）患者行肺叶切除术，1例（3.2%）患者行全肺切除术，5例（16.1%）患者行袖状肺叶切除术，2例（6.5%）患者行双肺叶切除术。中位手术时间为205 min（范围100-520），平均失血量为185 m L（范围10-1100）。15例患者出现致密粘连或纤维化。术后平均住院时间为6 d（范围3-13）。无手术相关死亡，仅5例（16.1%）患者发生术后并发症（无3级以上并发症）。10例（32.3%）患者达到主要病理缓解，22/31例（71.0%）患者出现纵隔病变降期。中位随访15.4个月，31例手术患者的中位无进展生存期/无病生存期（progression-free survival/disease-free survival, PFS/DFS）相对于未进行手术的无缓解或缓解的患者（分别为27.5个月vs 4.7个月vs 16.7个月）更长。结论初始不可切除的IIIB期NSCLC接受免疫联合化疗治疗后行根治性手术相对安全，手术相关死亡率和并发症发病率较低，与未手术患者相比DFS/PFS更长。

关键词：免疫联合化疗新辅助治疗初始不可切除非小细胞肺癌手术切除

来源：

同方期刊数据库评论

在线全文

同方期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The SUPER reporting guideline suggested for reporting of surgical technique

引用

Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition 2023年第4期12卷 534-544,I0024-I0026页

作者： Kaiping Zhang Yanfang Ma Jinlin Wu Qianling Shi Leandro Cardoso Barchi Marco Scarci rene horsleben petersen Calvin S.H.Ng Steven Hochwald Ryuichi Waseda Fabio Davoli Robert Fruscio Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri Michel Gonzalez Benjamin Wei Guillaume Piessen Jianfei Shen Xianzhuo Zhang Panpan Jiao Yulong He Nuria M.Novoa Benedetta Bedetti Sebastien Gilbert Alan D.L.Sihoe Alper Toker Alfonso Fiorelli Marcelo F.Jimenez Toni Lerut Aung Y.Oo Grace S.Li Xueqin Tang Yawen Lu Hussein Elkhayat Tomaz Stupnik Tanel Laisaar Firas Abu Akar Diego Gonzalez-Rivas Zhanhao Su Bin Qiu Stephen D.Wang Yaolong Chen Shugeng Gao Editorial Office AME Publishing CompanyHong KongChina School of Chinese Medicine Hong Kong Baptist UniversityHong KongChina Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Guangdong Provincial People’s HospitalGuangdong Academy of Medical SciencesGuangzhouChina Evidence-based Medicine Center School of Basic Medical SciencesLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina Lanzhou University Institute of Health Data Science LanzhouChina Digestive Surgery Division Department of GastroenterologyUniversity of Sao Paulo School of MedicineSão PauloBrazil Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University Hospital of CopenhagenRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark The Chinese University of Hong Kong Prince of Wales HospitalShatinNew TerritoriesHong KongChina Department of Surgical Oncology Roswell Park Cancer InstituteBuffaloNYUSA Department of General Thoracic Breast and Pediatric SurgeryFukuoka UniversityFukuokaJapan Department of Thoracic Surgery AUSL RomagnaS.Maria delle Croci Teaching HospitalRavennaItaly Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Milan-BicoccaSan Gerardo HospitalMonzaItaly Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation S.Camillo HospitalRomeItaly Service of Thoracic Surgery Lausanne University Hospital(CHUV)LausanneSwitzerland Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of SurgeryUniversity of Alabama BirminghamBirminghamALUSA University of Lille CNRSInsermCHU LilleUMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to TherapiesLilleFrance Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical UniversityLinhaiChina The First School of Clinical Medicine Lanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina Thoracic Surgery Service University Hospital of SalamancaBiomedical Institute of SalamancaSalamancaSpain Department of Thoracic Surgery Helios Clinic Bonn/Rhein SiegBonnGermany Division of Thoracic Surgery Department of SurgeryThe Ottawa

Background:Existing reporting guidelines pay insufficient attention to the detail and comprehensiveness reporting of surgical *** Surgical techniqUe rePorting chEcklist and standaRds(SUPER)aims to address this gap by defining reporting standards for surgical *** SUPER guideline intends to apply to articles that encompass surgical technique in any study design,surgical discipline,and stage of surgical ***:Following the EQUATOR(Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research)Network approach,16 surgeons,journal editors,and methodologists reviewed existing reporting guidelines relating to surgical technique,reviewed papers from 15 top journals,and brainstormed to draft initial items for the *** initial items were revised through a three-round Delphi survey from 21 multidisciplinary Delphi panel experts from 13 countries and *** final SUPER items were formed after an online consensus meeting to resolve disagreements and a three-round wording refinement by all 16 SUPER working group members and five SUPER ***:The SUPER reporting guideline includes 22 items that are considered essential for good and informative surgical technique *** items are divided into six sections:background,rationale,and objectives(items 1 to 5);preoperative preparations and requirements(items 6 to 9);surgical technique details(items 10 to 15);postoperative considerations and tasks(items 16 to 19);summary and prospect(items 20 and 21);and other information(item 22).Conclusions:The SUPER reporting guideline has the potential to guide detailed,comprehensive,and transparent surgical technique reporting for *** may also assist journal editors,peer reviewers,systematic reviewers,and guideline developers in the evaluation of surgical technique papers and help practitioners to better understand and reproduce surgical technique.

关键词： Surgical technique surgical innovation reporting guideline reporting checklist Surgical techniqUe rePorting chEcklist and standaRds(SUPER)

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：