检索结果-南通市图书馆

Author Meets Critics： Discussions on Roger T. Ames＇s Confuc/an Role Eth/cs： A Vocabulary——William Keli＇i Akina, Daniel A. Bell, Sarah Mattice, May Sim, ralph weber, wen haiming, and ZHANG Xianglong, with Responses by Roger T. Ames

引用

Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2012年第4期7卷 598-599页

作者： ralph weber wen haiming

Roger T. Ames, who teaches at the University of Hawai＇i at Manoa, is beyond any doubt one of the most prominent and original voices in current discourse on Chinese philosophy. For decades he has been extremely active in advocating an understanding of ancient Chinese texts that is explicitly philosophical, that is, it speaks directly to the philosophically minded （and not primarily to the philologically oriented sinologist）. Despite this clearly confined group of addressees, he speaks decidedly not in the terminology most familiar to practitioners of dominant or mainstream Westem philosophy. Although he frequently draws contrasts and analogies with more familiar figures and more general features of Western philosophy, his favorite approach makes it a point--in fact, the central point--to give Chinese philosophy a voice of its own and thus to read its texts ＂on their own terms＂（to be understood in its double meaning as conditions and vocabulary）. But, as Ames is very much aware, translating these texts on these terms still requires a vocabulary that is not their ＂own＂-and he has thus chosen dominantly the vocabulary of early American pragmatism as the most useful in articulating what he perceives are the sensibilities of Chinese philosophy. With his many interpretative studies and philosophical translations （often co-authored with David L. Hall and Henry Rosemont Jr.）, he has pushed the frontiers of Chinese philosophy as much as of philosophy in China in various ways and into various directions--something that has found an impressive echo both in terms of followers （many relate a story that they initially became interested in Chinese philosophy by having read, say, Hall and -Ames＇s Thinking Through Confucius） and in terms of critics, who have taken issue with particular translations, the overall approach, or with both.

关键词：

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：