检索结果-南通市图书馆

Recovery of threatened plant species and their habitats in the biodiversity hotspot of the Southwest Australian Floristic Region

引用

Plant Diversity 2019年第2期41卷 59-74页

作者： Leonie Monks Sarah Barrett Brett Beecham Margaret Byrne Alanna Chant David Coates J.Anne Cochrane Andrew Crawford Rebecca Dillon Colin Yates Biodiversity and Conservation Science Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions

The Southwest Australian Floristic Region(SWAFR) is a global biodiversity hotspot with high plant diversity and endemism and a broad range of threatening processes. An outcome of this is a high proportion of rare and threatened plant species. Ongoing discovery and taxonomic description of new species, many of which are rare, increases the challenges for recovery of threatened species and prioritisation of conservation actions. Current conservation of this diverse flora is based on integrated and scientific evidence-based management. Here we present an overview of current approaches to the conservation of threatened flora in the SWAFR with a focus on active management through recovery and restoration that is integrated with targeted research. Key threats include disease, fragmentation, invasive weeds, altered fire regimes, grazing, altered hydro-ecology and climate change. We highlight the integrated approach to management of threats and recovery of species with four case studies of threatened flora recovery projects that illustrate the breadth of interventions ranging from In situ management to conservation reintroductions and restoration of threatened species habitats. Our review and case studies emphasise that despite the scale of the challenge, a scientific understanding of threats and their impacts enables effective conservation actions to arrest decline and enhance recovery of threatened species and habitats.

关键词： Threatened species Threatening processes Conservation Recovery Restoration Biodiversity hotspot

来源：

维普期刊数据库

同方期刊数据库评论

在线全文

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

民族玩偶的伦理:在中国西南进行旅游研究

引用

广西民族学院学报（哲学社会科学版） 2005年第4期27卷 19-27页

作者：斯苇徐苑美国加州大学戴维斯分校厦门大学人类学研究所福建厦门361005

以中国西南地区彝族(Sani)的一些具有民族特色的符号装饰被使用于旅游产品的开发和旅游产品的生产和交换,以探讨“民族”是如何被装点在民族旅游活动当中的。

关键词：族群民族旅游玩偶民族艺术

来源：

维普期刊数据库

同方期刊数据库评论

在线全文

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Effects of Obesity and Smoking on Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

引用

Open Journal of Epidemiology 2016年第2期6卷 128-139页

作者： Damien M. Hansra Tulay Koru-Sengul Wei Zhao Feng Miao Alicia P. Monedero Stacey L. Tannenbaum David J. Lee Judith Hurley margaret M. byrne University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital Miami FL USA Department of Public Health Sciences and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center of University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami FL USA

Background: Obesity is an emerging leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US and the relationship between obesity, tobacco, and survival in NSCLC is unclear. Methods: Data (n = 87,631) were obtained from linkage of the 1996-2007 Florida Cancer Data System to the Agency for Health Care Administration database providing procedure and diagnoses codes. Survival time was calculated from date of diagnosis to date of death. Smoking status was categorized as never, current, and former. Obesity (yes/no) = ICD9 code BMI > 30 kg/m2, cachexia = ICD9 code “wasting syndrome”, & non-obese = non-obese & non cachectic. Cox proportional regression models used to predict survival;demographic, clinical, treatment factors, & comorbidities were included in adjusted models with smoking status and obesity as the main factors. Results: The majority of patients (pts) were either former (49%) or current (40%) smokers, & non-obese (88%). 6.8% of pts were obese & 4.8% of pts were cachectic. There were significant differences between survival curves and median survival (months) for obese vs. non-obese vs. cachectic pts. (20 vs 10 vs. 7.9;P < 0.001). Former and current smokers had shorter median survival than never smokers (10.8 & 9.2 vs. 11.9;P < 0.001). Survival rates (%) at 1-yr (60.1 vs. 45.2 vs. 37.7;P < 0.001), 5-yr (30.3 vs. 15.4 vs. 9.5;P < 0.001), 10-yr (18.1 vs. 7.6 vs. 2.7;P < 0.001) were better for obese vs. non-obese and cachectic pts respectively. Independent predictor of worse survival in the unadjusted model was former (HR 1.08;P < 0.001) and current (HR 1.20;P < 0.001) smokers compared to never. Obese and non-obese pts had better survival vs. cachexia pts. (HR 0.52;P < 0.001 and HR 0.80, p < 0.001 respectively) and obese had better survival than Non-obese pts (HR 0.65, p < 0.001). In the adjusted model, controlling for extensive variables and comorbidities, former (HR 1.11;P < 0.001) and current (HR 1.19;P < 0.001) smokers still had significantly worse survival vs. never smokers. Obese patients still had better surviv

关键词： Lung Cancer Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tobacco Smoking Obesity

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：