检索结果-南通市图书馆

Hyoscine for polyp detection during colonoscopy: A meta-analysis and systematic review

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2014年第11期6卷 549-554页

作者： imran Ashraf Sohail Ashraf Sameer siddique Douglas L Nguyen Abhishek Choudhary Matthew L Bechtold Department of Medicine University of Mis-souri Columbia MO 65212 United States Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Central Manchester University Hospitals M139WL Manchester United Kingdom Department of Medicine University of California Irvine CA 92868 United States

AIM: To assess the role of hyoscine for polyp detectionduring ***: Studies(randomized controlled trials orRCTs) that compared the use of hyoscine vs no hyo-scine or placebo for polyp detection during colonoscopywere included in our analysis. A search on multiple da-tabases was performed in September 2013 with searchterms being "hyoscine and colonoscopy", "hyoscineand polyp", "hyoscine and adenoma", "antispasmoticand colonoscopy", "antispasmotic and adenoma", and"antispasmotic and polyp". Jadad scoring was used toassess the quality of studies. The efficacy of hyoscinewas analyzed using Mantel-Haenszel model for polypand adenoma detection with odds ratio(OR). The I2measure of inconsistency was used to assess hetero-geneity(P 50%). Statistical analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1. Funnel plots was used to assess publication ***: The search of the electronic databases identified 283 articles. Of these articles, eight published RCTs performed at various locations in Europe, Asia, and Australia were included in our meta-analysis, seven published as manuscripts and one published as an ab-stract(n = 2307). All the studies included patients with a hyoscine and a no hyoscine/placebo group and were of adequate quality(Jadad score ≥ 2). Eight RCTs as-sessed the polyp detection rate(PDR)(n = 2307). The use of hyoscine demonstrated no statistically significant difference as compared to no hyoscine or placebo for PDR(OR = 1.06; 95%CI: 0.89-1.25; P = 0.51). Five RCTs assessed the adenoma detection rate(ADR)(n = 2015). The use of hyoscine demonstrated no statisti-cally significant difference as compared to no hyoscine or placebo for ADR(OR = 1.12; 95%CI: 0.92-1.37; P = 0.25). Furthermore, the timing of hyoscine admin-istration(given at cecal intubation or pre-procedure) demonstrated no differences in PDR compared to no hyoscine or placebo. Publication bias or heterogeneity was not observed for any of the ***: Hyoscine use in pa

关键词： Hyoscine Antispasmodic Polyp detection Colonoscopy

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：