检索结果-南通市图书馆

Peroral endoscopic myotomy vs laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication for esophageal achalasia: A single-center randomized controlled trial

引用

World Journal of Gastroenterology 2022年第33期28卷 4875-4889页

作者： Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Jose Jukemura Igor Braga Ribeiro galileu ferreira ayala farias Aureo Augusto de Almeida Delgado Lara Meireles Azeredo Coutinho Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura Rubens Antonio Aissar Sallum Ary Nasi Sergio A Sanchez-Luna Paulo Sakai Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura Departamento de Gastroenterologia Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de Sao PauloServico de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSPSao Paulo 05403-010Brazil Division of Esophageal Surgery Hospital das ClinicasUniversity of Sao Paulo School of MedicineSao Paulo 05403-010Brazil Departamento de Gastroenterologia Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de Sao PauloHospital das ClinicasUniversity of Sao Paulo School of MedicineSao Paulo 05403-010Brazil Department of Internal Medicine The University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of MedicineBasil I.Hirschowitz Endoscopic Center of ExcellenceDivision of Gastroenterology and HepatologyBirminghamAL 35233United States

BACKGROUND Achalasia is a rare benign esophageal motor disorder characterized by incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter(LES). The treatment of achalasia is not curative, but rather is aimed at reducing LES pressure. In patients who have failed noninvasive therapy, surgery should be considered. Myotomy with partial fundoplication has been considered the first-line treatment for non-advanced achalasia. Recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy(POEM), a technique that employs the principles of submucosal endoscopy to perform the equivalent of a surgical myotomy,has emerged as a promising minimally invasive technique for the management of this condition.AIM To compare POEM and laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication(LM-PF) regarding their efficacy and outcomes for the treatment of achalasia.METHODS Forty treatment-naive adult patients who had been diagnosed with achalasia based on clinical and manometric criteria(dysphagia score ≥ II and Eckardt score > 3) were randomized to undergo either LM-PF or POEM. The outcome measures were anesthesia time, procedure time, symptom improvement, reflux esophagitis(as determined with the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire), barium column height at 1 and 5 min(on a barium esophagogram), pressure at the LES, the occurrence of adverse events(AEs), length of stay(LOS), and quality of life(QoL).RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the LM-PF and POEM groups regarding symptom improvement at 1, 6, and 12 mo of follow-up(P = 0.192, P = 0.242, and P = 0.242, respectively). However, the rates of reflux esophagitis at 1, 6, and 12 mo of follow-up were significantly higher in the POEM group(P = 0.014, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). There were also no statistical differences regarding the manometry values, the occurrence of AEs, or LOS. Anesthesia time and procedure time were significantly shorter in the POEM group than in the LM-PF group(185.00 ± 56.89 and 95.70 ± 30.47 min vs 296.75 ± 56.13 and 218.75 ± 50.88 min,respecti

关键词： Esophageal achalasia Gastroesophageal reflux Deglutition disorders Heller myotomy Fundoplication Randomized controlled trial

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration vs fine needle biopsy in solid lesions:A multi-center analysis

引用

World Journal of Clinical Cases 2021年第34期9卷 10507-10517页

作者： Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Moura Thomas R McCarty Pichamol Jirapinyo Igor Braga Ribeiro galileu ferreira ayala farias Antonio Coutinho Madruga-Neto Marvin Ryou Christopher C Thompson Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit University of Sao Paulo School of MedicineSão PauloSP 05403-010Brazil Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and EndoscopyBrigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMA 02115United States Division of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy University of São Paulo Medical SchoolSão PauloSP 01246-903Brazil

BACKGROUND While endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration(FNA)is considered a preferred technique for tissue sampling for solid lesions,fine needle biopsy(FNB)has recently been developed.AIM To compare the accuracy of FNB vs FNA in determining the diagnosis of solid lesions.METHODS A retrospective,multi-center study of EUS-guided tissue sampling using FNA vs FNB needles.Measured outcomes included diagnostic test characteristics(i.e.,sensitivity,specificity,accuracy),use of rapid on-site evaluation(ROSE),and adverse events.Subgroup analyses were performed by type of lesion and diagnostic yield with or without ROSE.A multivariable logistic regression was also performed.RESULTS A total of 1168 patients with solid lesions(n=468 FNA;n=700 FNB)underwent EUS-guided sampling.Mean age was 65.02±12.13 years.Overall,sensitivity,specificity and accuracy were superior for FNB vs FNA(84.70%vs 74.53%;99.29%vs 96.62%;and 87.62%vs 81.55%,respectively;P0.05).Multivariate analysis showed no significant predictor for better accuracy.On subgroup analyses,FNB was superior to FNA for non-pancreatic lesions;however,there was no difference between the techniques among pancreatic lesions.One adverse event was reported in each group.CONCLUSION FNB is superior to FNA with equivalent diagnostic test characteristics compared to FNA+ROSE in the diagnosis of non-pancreatic solid lesions.Our results suggest that EUS-FNB may eliminate the need of ROSE and should be employed as a first-line method in the diagnosis of solid lesions.

关键词： Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition Fine needle aspiration Fine needle biopsy Solid lesions Endoscopic ultrasound Cancer

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：