检索结果-南通市图书馆

Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for huge (≥10 cm) liver tumors: an international multicenter propensity-score matched cohort study of 799 cases

引用

Hepatobiliary Surgery and nutrition 2023年第2期12卷 205-215,I0005页

作者： Tan-To Cheung Rong Liu Federica Cipriani Xiaoying Wang Mikhail Efanov David Fuks Gi-Hong Choi nicholas L.Syn Charing C.n.Chong Fabrizio Di Benedetto Ricardo Robles-Campos Vincenzo Mazzaferro fern.n.o rotellar Santiago Lopez-Ben James o.Park Alejandro Mejia Iswanto Sucandy Adrian K.H.Chiow Marco V.Marino Mikel Gastaca Jae Hoon Lee TPeter Kingham Mathieu D’Hondt Sung Hoon Choi Robert P.Sutcliffe Ho-Seong Han Chung-ngai Tang Johann Pratschke Roberto I.Troisi Go Wakabayashi Daniel Cherqui Felice Giuliante Davit L.Aghayan Bjorn Edwin olivier Scatton Atsushi Sugioka Tran Cong Duy Long Constantino Fondevila Mohammad Abu Hilal Andrea Ruzzenente Alessandro Ferrero Paulo Herman Kuo-Hsin Chen Luca Aldrighetti Brian K.P.Goh International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators Department of Surgery Queen Mary HospitalThe University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army(PLA)General HospitalBeijingChina Hepatobiliary Surgery Division IRCCS San Raffaele HospitalMilanItaly Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation Liver Cancer InstituteZhongshan HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiChina Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Moscow Clinical Scientific CenterMoscowRussia Department of Digestive Oncologic and Metabolic SurgeryInstitute Mutualiste MontsourisUniversite Paris DescartesParisFrance Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department of SurgerySeverance HospitalYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery Singapore General Hospital and Yong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department of SurgeryPrince of Wales HospitalThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly Department of General Visceral and Transplantation SurgeryClinic and University Hospital Virgen de la ArrixacaIMIB-ARRIXACAMurciaSpain HPB Surgery Hepatology and Liver TransplantationFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di MilanoMilanItaly HPB and Liver Transplant Unit Department of General SurgeryClinica Universidad de NavarraUniversidad de NavarraPamplonaSpain Institute of Health Research of navarra(IdisnA) PamplonaSpain Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit Department of SurgeryDr.Josep Trueta HospitalIdIBGiGironaSpain Hepatobiliary Surgical oncology Department of SurgeryUniversity of Washington Medical CenterSeattleWAUSA The Liver Institute Methodist Dallas Medical CenterDallasTXUSA AdventHealth Tampa Digestive Health InstituteTampaFLUSA Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit Department of SurgeryChangi General

Background:The use of laparoscopic(LLR)and robotic liver resections(RLR)has been safely performed in many institutions for liver tumours.A large scale international multicenter study would provide stronger evidence and insight into application of these techniques for huge liver tumours≥10 ***:This was a retrospective review of 971 patients who underwent LLR and RLR for huge(≥10 cm)tumors at 42 international centers between ***:one hundred RLR and 699 LLR which met study criteria were *** comparison between the 2 approaches for patients with huge tumors were performed using 1:3 propensity-score matching(PSM)(73 vs.219).Before PSM,LLR was associated with significantly increased frequency of previous abdominal surgery,malignant pathology,liver cirrhosis and increased median *** PSM,RLR and LLR was associated with no significant difference in key perioperative outcomes including media operation time(242 vs.290 min,P=0.286),transfusion rate rate(19.2%vs.16.9%,P=0.652),median blood loss(200 vs.300 mL,P=0.694),open conversion rate(8.2%vs.11.0%,P=0.519),morbidity(28.8%vs.21.9%,P=0.221),major morbidity(4.1%vs.9.6%,P=0.152),mortality and postoperative length of stay(6 vs.6 days,P=0.435).Conclusions:RLR and LLR can be performed safely for selected patients with huge liver tumours with excellent *** was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes after RLR or LLR.

关键词： Laparoscopic liver resection(LLR) robotic liver resection(RLR) hepatocellular carcinoma colorectal liver metastases huge

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：