检索结果-南通市图书馆

Single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: State of art

World Journal of Gastroenterology 2014年第20期20卷 6073-6080页

作者： fabio cianchi fabio Staderini Benedetta Badii Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine Center of Oncological Minimally Invasive Surgery University of Florence 50134 Florence Italy

A number of clinical trials have demonstrated that the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resection provides the same oncologic results as open surgery along with all clinical benefits of minimally invasive surgery. During the last years, a great effort has been made to research for minimizing parietal trauma, yet for cosmetic reasons and in order to further reduce surgery-related pain and morbidity. New techniques, such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopy (SIL) have been developed in order to reach the goal of “scarless” surgery. Although NOTES may seem not fully suitable or safe for advanced procedures, such as colectomies, SIL is currently regarded as the next major advance in the progress of minimally invasive surgical approaches to colorectal disease that is more feasible in generalized use. The small incision through the umbilicus allows surgeons to use familiar standard laparoscopic instruments and thus, perform even complex procedures which require extraction of large surgical specimens or intestinal anastomosis. The cosmetic result from SIL is also better because the only incision is made through the umbilicus which can hide the wound effectively after operation. However, SIL raises a number of specific new challenges compared with the laparoscopic conventional approach. A reduced capacity for triangulation, the repeated conflicts between the shafts of the instruments and the difficulties to achieve a correct exposure of the operative field are the most claimed issues. The use therefore of this new approach for complex colorectal procedures might understandingly be viewed as difficult to implement, especially for oncologic cases.

关键词： Colorectal cancer Laparoscopic surgery Single-incision surgery Single-access surgery Scarless surgery Technical challenges

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Robotic rectal surgery: State of the art

引用

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology 2016年第11期8卷 757-771页

作者： fabio Staderini Caterina Foppa Alessio Minuzzo Benedetta Badii Etleva Qirici Giacomo Trallori Beatrice Mallardi Gabriele Lami Giuseppe Macrì Andrea Bonanomi Siro Bagnoli Giuliano Perigli fabio cianchi Center of Oncological Minimally Invasive Surgery Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine University of Florence Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences University of Florence Istituto per lo Studio e Prevenzione Onco-logica Unit of Gastroenterology

Laparoscopic rectal surgery has demonstrated its superiority over the open approach, however it still has some technical limitations that lead to the development of robotic platforms. Nevertheless the literature on this topic is rapidly expanding there is still no consensus about benefits of robotic rectal cancer surgery over the laparoscopic one. For this reason a review of all the literature examining robotic surgery for rectal cancer was performed. Two reviewers independently conducted a search of electronic databases (PubMed and EMBASE) using the key words “rectum”, “rectal”, “cancer”, “laparoscopy”, “robot”. After the initial screen of 266 articles, 43 papers were selected for review. A total of 3013 patients were included in the review. The most commonly performed intervention was low anterior resection (1450 patients, 48.1%), followed by anterior resections (997 patients, 33%), ultra-low anterior resections (393 patients, 13%) and abdominoperineal resections (173 patients, 5.7%). Robotic rectal surgery seems to offer potential advantages especially in low anterior resections with lower conversions rates and better preservation of the autonomic function. Quality of mesorectum and status of and circumferential resection margins are similar to those obtained with conventional laparoscopy even if robotic rectal surgery is undoubtedly associated with longer operative times. This review demonstrated that robotic rectal surgery is both safe and feasible but there is no evidence of its superiority over laparoscopy in terms of postoperative, clinical outcomes and incidence of complications. In conclusion robotic rectal surgery seems to overcome some of technical limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery especially for tumors requiring low and ultra-low anterior resections but this technical improvement seems not to provide, until now, any significant clinical advantages to the patients.

关键词： Robotic surgery Robotic rectal surgery DaVinci rectal surgery Robotic rectal cancer Robotics for rectal cancer Robotic rectal resection

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery

引用

World Journal of Gastroenterology 2017年第13期23卷 2376-2384页

作者： Amilcare Parisi Daniel Reim Felice Borghi Ninh T Nguyen Feng Qi Andrea Coratti fabio cianchi Maurizio Cesari Francesca Bazzocchi Orhan Alimoglu Johan Gagnière Graziano Pernazza Simone D'Imporzano Yan-Bing Zhou Juan-Santiago Azagra Olivier Facy Steven T Brower Zhi-Wei Jiang Lu Zang Arda Isik Alessandro Gemini Stefano Trastulli Alexander Novotny Alessandra Marano Tong Liu Mario Annecchiarico Benedetta Badii Giacomo Arcuri Andrea Avanzolini Metin Leblebici Denis Pezet Shou-Gen Cao Martine Goergen Shu Zhang Giorgio Palazzini Vito D'Andrea Jacopo Desiderio Department of Digestive Surgery St.Mary's HospitalUniversity of Perugia Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Chirurgie Klinikum Rechts der IsarTechnical University Munich Department of Surgery General and Oncologic Surgery UnitSanta Croce e Carle Hospital Department of Surgery Division of Gastrointestinal SurgeryUniversity of CaliforniaIrvine Medical Center Gastrointestinal Surgery Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Division of Oncological and Robotic Surgery Department of OncologyCareggi University Hospital Unit of general and endocrine surgery Center of oncologic minimally invasive surgery(COMIS)Careggi University Hospital Department of General Surgery Hospital of Cittàdi CastelloUSL1 Umbria Department of General Surgery Division of GeneralGastroenterologic and Minimally Invasive SurgeryG.B.Morgagni Hospital Department of General Surgery School of MedicineIstanbul Medeniyet University Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery Estaing University Hospital Department of Surgery Robotic General Surgery UnitSan Giovanni Addolorata Hospital Esophageal Surgery Unit Tuscany Regional Referral Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal DiseaseMedical University of Pisa Department of General Surgery The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Unitédes Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif et Endocrine Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Cancérologique CHU Bocage Department of Surgical Oncology and HPB Surgery Englewood Hospital and Medical Center Department of General Surgery Jinling HospitalMedical SchoolNanjing University Department of Surgery Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong UniversitySchool of Medicine Department of General Surgery Erzincan UniversitySchool of Medicine Department of Surgical Science “La Sapienza”University Department of Digestive Surgery St.Mary's Hospital of Terni-University of Perugia

AIM To investigate the role of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer and determine surgical, clinical, and oncological *** This is a propensity score-matched case-control study, comparing three treatment arms: robotic gastrectomy(RG), laparoscopic gastrectomy(LG), open gastrectomy(OG). Data collection started after sharing a specific study protocol. Data were recorded through a tailored and protected web-based system. Primary outcomes: harvested lymph nodes, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications rate. Among the secondary outcomes, there are: operative time, R0 resections, POD of mobilization, POD of starting liquid diet and soft solid diet. The analysis includes the evaluation of type and grade of postoperative complications. Detailed information of anastomotic leakages is also *** The present analysis was carried out of 1026 gastrectomies. To guarantee homogenous distribution of cases, patients in the RG, LG and OG groups were 1:1:2 matched using a propensity score analysis with a caliper = 0.2. The successful matching resulted in a total sample of 604 patients(RG = 151; LG = 151; OG = 302). The three groups showed no differences in all baseline patients characteristics, type of surgery(P = 0.42) and stage of the disease(P = 0.16). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the LG(95.93 ± 119.22) and RG(117.91 ± 68.11) groups compared to the OG(127.26 ± 79.50, P = 0.002). The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was similar between the RG(27.78 ± 11.45), LG(24.58 ± 13.56) and OG(25.82 ± 12.07) approach. A benefit in favor of the minimally invasive approaches was found in the length of hospital stay(P < 0.0001). A similar complications rate was found(P = 0.13). The leakage rate was not different(P = 0.78) between *** Laparoscopic and robotic surgery can be safely performed and proposed as possible alternative to open surgery. The main highlighted benefit is a faster postoperative functional recov

关键词： Gastric cancer Gastrectomy Minimally invasive surgery Robotic Robot-assisted Laparoscopy

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：