检索结果-南通市图书馆

Evaluation of joint awareness after acetabular fracture:Validation of the Forgotten Joint Score according to the COSMIN checklist protocol

引用

World Journal of Orthopedics 2021年第2期12卷 69-81页

作者： Viola Freigang Johannes Weber Karolina Mueller christian pfeifer Michael Worlicek Volker Alt Florian Michael Baumann Department of Trauma Surgery Regensburg University Medical CenterRegensburg 93042Germany Center for Clinical Studies Regensburg University Medical CenterRegensburg 93042Germany

BACKGROUND A fracture of the acetabulum is an uncommon,but serious injury.Established outcome tools do not reflect the patient’s perspective after fracture of the hip joint.Originally designed for post-arthroplasty patients,the Forgotten Joint Score(FJS)is a patient-reported outcome measurement(PROM)tool evaluating the diseasespecific health-related quality of life(HR-QoL).AIM To validate the FJS in patients after acetabular fracture.METHODS In a prospective mono-centric cohort study,we evaluated 100 patients at mean 5.2±3.6 years after a fracture of the acetabulum.The validation study followed the complete COSMIN checklist protocol.For calculation of convergent validity,we used the Tegner-Activity Scale,the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index,the EuroQol-5D,and a subjective rating of change as an anchor variable.RESULTS We confirmed good internal consistency with a Cronbach‘s alpha of 0.95.With an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99(95%CI:0.97,0.99),test-retest reliability of the FJS was excellent.Correlation coefficients between the questionnaires were moderate to high ranging from|0.56|to|0.83|(absolute value).No relevant floor or ceiling effects occurred.Standard error of measurement was 3.2 and smallest detectable change(SDC)was 8.8.Thus,changes greater than 8.8 points between two assessments denote a real change in FJS.CONCLUSION The FJS is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of patient-reported outcome in posttraumatic condition after acetabular fracture.The SDC indicating a real clinical improvement was 8.8 points in the FJS.We could confirm responsiveness of the FJS and found no relevant floor-or ceiling effects.

关键词： Patient reported outcome measurement Validation study Hip joint Forgotten Joint Score Acetabulum fracture COSMIN checklist

来源：

维普期刊数据库评论

在线全文

维普期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

宝马世界

引用

城市环境设计 2020年第4期126卷 134-149页

作者：沃尔夫·狄·普瑞克斯 Paul Kath Tom Wiscombe Waltraut Hoheneder Mona Marbach Hans Aescht Beatrix Basting Guy Bebiè Chris Beccone Johannes Behrens Marcelo Bernardi Pawel Bodzak Verena Boyer Antja Bulthaup Claudia Buhmann Timo Carl Jan Chaldil Ing Tse Chen Tadeusz Chimiak Andrea Christmann Patrick Erhardt Stephan Exsternbrink Wolfgang Fiel Benedikt Frass Helmut Fr?tscher Volker Gessendorfer Andrea Graser Lukas Haller Markus Henning Armin Hess Jens Hoff Tamas Horvath Robert Huebser Astrid Jagersberger Marin Jurycz Gregor Kassl Areta Keller Markus Klausecker Tobias Klein Martin Konrad Quirin Krumbholz Caroline Kufferath Marion Lattenmayer Stefan Laub Wolfgang Leitgeb Andreas Mieling Karin Miesenberger Dennis Milam Elke Müller Henrike Münker Claudia Nehammer Martin Oberascher Alexander Ott Stefan Pfefferle Florian pfeifer Markus Pillhofer Ekkehard Rehfeld Goswin Rothenthal Wolfgang Ruthensteiner Jasmin Sauerbier Florian Schafschetzy Kristina Schinegger Karolin Schmidbaur Patrick Schneider Katharina Schneider Hubert Schoba Angus Schoenberger Andrea Sch?ning Anja Sorger Gernot Stangl Mark Steinmetz Sigrid Steinwender Martina Tippelskirch Dionicio Valdez Pascal Vauclair Akvile Rimantaite Andreas Weissenbach Heribert Wolfmayer Irina Zahler 2007 Ari Marcopoulos Gerald Zugmann Hélène Binet Duccio Malagamba Marcus Buck christian Richters Richard Walch

项目大事记/CHRONOLOGY竞赛（一等奖）/Competition（1st Prize）:2001规划设计起始时间/Start of Planning:11/2001施工起始时间/Start of Construction:08/2003投入使用/Opening:20/10/2007-21/10/2007项目参数/PROJECT DATA用地面积/Site Area:约25 000m2/Approx. 25 000m2建筑毛面积/Gross Floor Area:约73 000m2（除坡道）=100%/Approx.73 000m2（excluding ramps）=100%地上建筑毛面积/Gross Floor Area above ground:约28 500m2=40%/Approx.28 500m2=40%地下建筑毛面积/Gross Floor Area underground:约44 500m2=60%/Approx.44 500m2=60%

关键词：

来源：

同方期刊数据库评论

在线全文

同方期刊数据库

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

欢迎您,

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

欢迎您,

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

在线全文

在线全文

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：