咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Method for multi-attribute gro... 收藏

Method for multi-attribute group decision-making based on the compromise weights

Method for multi-attribute group decision-making based on the compromise weights

作     者:Shengbao Yao Wan'an Cui 

作者机构:School of Business Administration Zhongnan University of Economics and Law Wuhan 430073 P. R. China College of Management Guangxi University for Nationalities Nanning 530006 P. R. China 

出 版 物:《Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics》 (系统工程与电子技术(英文版))

年 卷 期:2010年第21卷第4期

页      面:591-597页

核心收录:

学科分类:12[管理学] 1201[管理学-管理科学与工程(可授管理学、工学学位)] 07[理学] 070105[理学-运筹学与控制论] 0701[理学-数学] 

基  金:supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education of China(09YJC630229) Scientific Research Foundation of Guangxi University for Nationalities for Talent Introduction(200702YZ01) Science and Technology Project of State Ethnic Affairs Commission(09GX03) 

主  题:group decision-making incomplete information preference relation compromise weight. 

摘      要:Multi-attribute group decision-making problems are considered where information on both attribute weights and value scores of consequences is *** group decision analysis,if preference information about alternatives is provided by participants,it should be verified whether there exist compromise weights that can support all the preference *** different compromise weight vectors may differ for the ranking of the *** the case that compromise weights exist,the method is proposed to find out all the compromise weight vectors in order to rank the *** on the new feasible domain of attribute weights determined by all the compromise weight vectors and the incomplete information on value scores of consequences,dominance relations between alternatives are checked by a nonlinear goal programming model which can be transformed into a linear one by adopting a *** checked dominance relations uniformly hold for all compromise weight vectors and the incomplete information on value scores of consequences.A final ranking of the alternatives can be obtained by aggregating these dominance relations.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分