咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Gemcitabine plus concurrent ir... 收藏

Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

作     者:Yang-Yang Ma Yin Leng Yan-Li Xing Hong-Mei Li Ji-Bing Chen Li-Zhi Niu 

作者机构:Central LaboratoryAffiliated Fuda Cancer HospitalJinan UniversityGuangzhou 510665Guangdong ProvinceChina Department of OncologyAffiliated Fuda Cancer HospitalJinan UniversityGuangzhou 510665Guangdong ProvinceChina Department of Interventional RadiologyAffiliated Fuda Cancer HospitalJinan UniversityGuangzhou 510665Guangdong ProvinceChina 

出 版 物:《World Journal of Clinical Cases》 (世界临床病例杂志)

年 卷 期:2020年第8卷第22期

页      面:5564-5575页

核心收录:

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100214[医学-肿瘤学] 10[医学] 

基  金:Supported by International Science Foundation of Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital Jinan University No.Y2018-ZD-01 

主  题:Irreversible electroporation Gemcitabine Locally advanced pancreatic cancer Overall survival Progression free survival Prognostic factors 

摘      要:BACKGROUND Locally advanced pancreatic cancer(LAPC)is a common malignant digestive system tumor that ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the *** prognosis of LAPC is poor even after standard *** electroporation(IRE)is a novel ablative strategy for *** studies have confirmed the safety of *** date,no prospective studies have been performed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of conventional gemcitabine(GEM)plus concurrent *** To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conventional GEM plus concurrent IRE and GEM alone for *** From February 2016 to September 2017,a total of 68 LAPC patients were treated with GEM plus concurrent IRE(n=33)or GEM alone(n=35).Overall survival(OS),progression free survival(PFS),and procedure-related complications were compared between the two *** analyses were performed to identify any prognostic *** There were no treatment-related *** technical success rate of IRE ablation was 100%.The GEM+IRE group had a significantly longer OS from the time of diagnosis of LAPC(19.8 mo vs 9.3 mo,P0.0001)than the GEM alone *** GEM+IRE group had a significantly longer PFS(8.3 mo vs 4.7 mo,P0.0001)than the GEM alone *** volume less than 37 cm3 and GEM plus concurrent IRE were identified as significant favorable factors for both the OS and *** Gemcitabine plus concurrent IRE is an effective treatment for patients with LAPC.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分