咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Prognostic ability of inflamma... 收藏

Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

作     者:Grant Yoneoka Kliment Bozhilov Linda L.Wong Grant Yoneoka;Kliment Bozhilov;Linda L.Wong

作者机构:Transplant CenterThe Queen’s Medical CenterHonoluluHI 96813USA Department of SurgeryUniversity of HawaiiJohn A.Burns School of MedicineHonoluluHI 96813USA 

出 版 物:《Hepatoma Research》 (肝癌研究(英文版))

年 卷 期:2020年第6卷第10期

页      面:11-21页

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100214[医学-肿瘤学] 10[医学] 

基  金:This study was partially supported by National Institutes of Health(1U01CA230690-01) 

主  题:Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio transarterial radioembolization hepatocellular carcinoma 

摘      要:Aim:Inflammation-based markers,such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR)and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR),have recently been used as prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).We aimed to determine whether NLR and PLR may predict response to yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization(TARE)as primary treatment for ***:We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of HCC cases(1994-2019)and selected patients who received TARE as primary treatment(n=42).Laboratory studies were used to calculate NLR and *** to TARE was determined using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors(mRECIST).Patients were classified as non-responders(stable or progressive disease)or responders(partial or complete response)to treatment based on ***:Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a pre-treatment NLR cutoff of≥2.83 and a pre-treatment PLR cutoff of≥83 for predicting non-response to ***-treatment NLR≥2.83 was the only significant predictor of non-response to TARE in multivariate logistic regression analysis(odds ratio 7.83,P=0.036).On time to progression analysis,both pre-treatment NLR≥2.83 and pre-treatment PLR≥83 were associated with a higher proportion of tumor progression at 6 months post-treatment(43.6%vs.10.0%,P=0.014,log-rank)and(38.6%vs.0%,P=0.010,log-rank),***:NLR confers prognostic value and may be superior to PLR in determining response to TARE as primary treatment for *** studies are necessary to validate these findings in a larger cohort.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分