Multi-outcome longitudinal small area estimation-a case study
作者机构:Center for Statistical Research&MethodologyCensus BureauWashingtonDCUSA Mathematics DepartmentUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMDUSA
出 版 物:《Statistical Theory and Related Fields》 (统计理论及其应用(英文))
年 卷 期:2019年第3卷第2期
页 面:136-149页
学科分类:07[理学] 0714[理学-统计学(可授理学、经济学学位)] 0701[理学-数学] 0812[工学-计算机科学与技术(可授工学、理学学位)] 070101[理学-基础数学]
主 题:Bayesian computation Current Population Survey generalised logistic regression gross flows mixed-effects model small-area estimation
摘 要:A recent paper [Thibaudeau, Slud, and Gottschalck (2017). Modeling log-linear conditional probabilities for estimation in surveys. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 11, 680–697] proposed a ‘hybrid’method of survey estimation combining coarsely cross-classified design-based survey-weightedtotals in a population with loglinear or generalised-linear model-based conditional probabilitiesfor cells in a finer cross-classification. The models were compared in weighted and unweightedforms on data from the US Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), a large nationallongitudinal survey. The hybrid method was elaborated in a book-chapter [Thibaudeau, Slud,& Cheng (2019). Small-area estimation of cross-classified gross flows using longitudinal survey data. In P. Lynn (Ed.), Methodology of longitudinal surveys II. Wiley] about estimating grossflows in (two-period) longitudinal surveys, by considering fixed versus mixed effect versionsof the conditional-probability models and allowing for 3 or more outcomes in the later-periodcategories used to define gross flows within generalised logistic regression models. The methodology provided for point and interval small-area estimation, specifically area-level two-periodlabour-status gross-flow estimation, illustrated on a US Current Population Survey (CPS) datasetof survey respondents in two successive months in 16 states. In the current paper, that data analysis is expanded in two ways: (i) by analysing the CPS dataset in greater detail, incorporatingmultiple random effects (slopes as well as intercepts), using predictive as well as likelihood metrics for model quality, and (ii) by showing how Bayesian computation (MCMC) provides insightsconcerning fixed- versus mixed-effect model predictions. The findings from fixed-effect analyseswith state effects, from corresponding models with state random effects, and fom Bayes analysisof posteriors for the fixed state-effects with other model coefficients fixed, all confirm each othera