伴或不伴暂时性回肠造口的复原性结肠直肠切除术的预后
The outcome after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy作者机构:Department of Colorectal Surgery/A30Cleveland Clinic Foundation9500 Euclid AvenueClevelandOH 44195United States.Dr
出 版 物:《世界核心医学期刊文摘(胃肠病学分册)》 (Core Journals in Gastroenterology)
年 卷 期:2006年第2卷第10期
页 面:3-3页
学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100210[医学-外科学(含:普外、骨外、泌尿外、胸心外、神外、整形、烧伤、野战外)] 10[医学]
主 题:结肠直肠切除术 回肠造口 复原性 直肠吻合术 回肠贮袋 生活质量状况 毒性反应 早期肠梗阻 脓毒症
摘 要:PURPOSE: Controversy exists regarding the safety for omission of diverting ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy because of fears of increased septic complications. This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy in a consecutive series of patients by comparing postoperative complications, functional results, and quality of life in patients with and without diverting ileostomy. METHODS: Data regarding demograph- ics, length of stay, surgical characteristics, and complications were reviewed and recorded according to the presence (n= 1,725) or absence (n = 277) of a diverting ileostomy at the time of pelvic pouch surgery. Criteria for omission of ileostomy included: stapled anastomosis, tension-free anastomosis, intact tissue rings, good hemostasis, absence of airleaks, malnutrition, toxicity, anemia, and prolonged consumption of steroids. Functional outcome and quality of life indicators were prospectively recorded and compared. RESULTS: Patients in the ileostomy group had greater body surface area and older mean age at time of surgery, were taking greater doses of steroids preoperatively, and required more blood transfusions at the time of surgery compared with the one-stage (P 0.05). Early postoperative ileus was more common in the one-stage group (P 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in quality of life and functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: For carefully selected patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, omission of diverting ileost- omy is a safe procedure that does not lead to an increase inseptic complications or mortality. Quality of life and functional results are similar to those who undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diversion, provided that certain selection factors are considered.