咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Kolmogorov’s Probability Space... 收藏

Kolmogorov’s Probability Spaces for “Entangled” Data-Subsets of EPRB Experiments: No Violation of Einstein’s Separation Principle

作     者:Karl Hess 

作者机构:Center for Advanced Study University of Illinois Urbana Illinois USA 

出 版 物:《Journal of Modern Physics》 (现代物理(英文))

年 卷 期:2020年第11卷第5期

页      面:683-702页

学科分类:07[理学] 070201[理学-理论物理] 0702[理学-物理学] 

主  题:Bell’s Theorem Einstein’s Separation Principle EPRB Experiments 

摘      要:It is demonstrated that the use of Kolmogorov’s probability theory to describe results of quantum probability for EPRB (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm) experiments requires extreme care when different subsets of measurement outcomes are considered. J. S. Bell and his followers have committed critical inaccuracies related to spin-gauge and probability measures of such subsets, because they use exclusively a single probability space for all data sets and sub-sets of data. It is also shown that Bell and followers use far too stringent epistemological requirements for the consequences of space-like separation. Their requirements reach way beyond Einstein’s separation principle and cannot be met by the major existing physical theories including relativity and even classical mechanics. For example, the independent free will does not empower the experimenters to choose multiple independent spin-gauges in the two EPRB wings. It is demonstrated that the suggestion of instantaneous influences at a distance (supposedly “derived from experiments with entangled quantum entities) is a consequence of said inaccuracies and takes back rank as soon as the Kolmogorov probability measures are related to a consistent global spin-gauge and permitted to be different for different data subsets: Using statistical interpretations and different probability spaces for certain subsets of outcomes instead of probability amplitudes related to single quantum entities, permits physical explanations without a violation of Einstein’s separation principle.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分