Laser therapy versus intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents in monotherapy of ROP:a Meta-analysis

作     者：Shi-Dan Wang Guo-Ming Zhang 

作者机构：Shenzhen Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group Department of Pediatric Retinal SurgeryShenzhen Eye HospitalShenzhen Key Ophthalmic Laboratorythe Second Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityShenzhen 518040Guangdong ProvinceChina 

出 版 物：《International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition)》 (国际眼科杂志（英文版）)

年 卷 期：2020年第13卷第5期

页      面：806-815页

核心收录：

学科分类：1002[医学-临床医学] 100212[医学-眼科学] 10[医学] 

基　　金：Supported by the Basic Discipline Layout Foundation of the Shenzhen Science and Innovation Commission(No.JCYJ20170817112542555) 

主　　题：anti-vascular endothelial growth factor bevacizumab laser therapy Meta-analysis retinopathy of prematurity recurrence ranibizumab 

摘      要：AIM:To compare the efficacy and safety between laser therapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)agents intravitreal injection monotherapy in type-1 retinopathy of prematurity(ROP)and aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity(APROP).METHODS:A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed,Cochrane Library,and Embase for original comparable *** included studies that compare laser therapy and intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents monotherapy in ROP regardless of languages and publication ***:Complication incidence was significantly higher in laser therapy group(OR:0.38;95%CI:0.19-0.75;P=0.005).Spherical equivalent(SE)was higher in laser therapy[weighted mean difference(WMD):2.40,95%CI:0.88-3.93;P=0.002].The time between treatment and retreatment was longer in laser therapy group(WMD:8.45,95%CI:5.35-11.55;P0.00001).Recurrence incidence(OR:0.97;95%CI:0.45-2.09;P=0.93)and retreatment incidence(OR:1.24;95%CI:0.56-2.73;P=0.59)were similar in two *** analysis between type-1 ROP and APROP was not significant except SE reported in the included studies(P0.0001).CONCLUSION:This Meta-analysis outcome indicates anti-VEGF agents are as effective as laser treatment,and safer than laser in type-1 ROP and *** degree of myopia in APROP is higher than type-1 *** randomized controlled trials in large sample size should be conducted in the future.