Carbon Storage Capacity of Different Plantation Types Under Sandstorm Source Control Program in Hebei Province, China
Carbon Storage Capacity of Different Plantation Types Under Sandstorm Source Control Program in Hebei Province, China作者机构:Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources Hebei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water-Saving Center for Agricultural Resources Research Institute of Genetics and Developmental BiologyChinese Academy of Sciences Agriculture School Kunming University Forestry Bureau of Aohan Banner Forestry Bureau of Hexigten Banner
出 版 物:《Chinese Geographical Science》 (中国地理科学(英文版))
年 卷 期:2014年第24卷第4期
页 面:454-460页
核心收录:
学科分类:09[农学] 0903[农学-农业资源与环境]
基 金:Under the auspices of Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(No.XDA05060600) Knowledge Innovation Programs of Chinese Academy of Science(No.KSCX2-EW-J-5)
主 题:carbon content carbon storage forestry program tree species
摘 要:Afforestation and reforestation are effective and ecological ways of mitigating elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide(CO2) concentration and increasing carbon(C) storage in terrestrial ecosystems. In this study, we measured the above-ground(tree, herbaceous plants and litter) and below-ground(root and soil) C storage in an aspen plantation(Populus davidiana) monoculture(PD), a larch plantation(Larix pincipis-rupprechtii) monoculture(LP), a pine plantation(Pinus tabulaeformis) monoculture(PT), a larch and birch mixed plantation(L. pincipis-rupprechtii and Betula platyphlla mixed)(MLB), and an apricot plantation(Armeniaca sibirica) monoculture(AS) under the Desertification Combating Program in Hebei Province, the northern China. The objective was to assess the effect of afforestation species on ecosystem C pools of different plantation types. Results showed that C storage of LP stand(258.0 Mg/ha) and MLB(163.4 Mg/ha) were significantly higher than the C storage in PD(45.5 Mg/ha), PT(58.9 Mg/ha) and AS(49.4 Mg/ha), respectively. Soil C was the main carbon pool of the ecosystem C storage in the five plantation stands, ranging from 31.4 Mg/ha to 232.5 Mg/ha, which accounted for 69.0%–90.1% of the total ecosystem C storage. The C storage in tree layer was about 5.2%–23.2% of ecosystem C storage. The herbaceous plants and litter layers contained 1.0%–6.0% and 1.5%–3.3% of ecosystem C storage, respectively. Our results suggest that tree species should be incorporated to accurately develop regional C budget of afforestation program, and also imply that substantial differences in ecosystem C stocks among plantation types can facilitate decision making on C management.