咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Scintigraphic detection of car... 收藏

Scintigraphic detection of carcinoid tumors with a cost effectiveness analysis

Scintigraphic detection of carcinoid tumors with a cost effectiveness analysis

作     者:DimitrisDimitroulopoulos DimitrisXynopoulos KlisthenisTsamakidis EmmanouelParaskevas Athanassios Zisimopoulos Efthymios Andriotis Ekaterini Fotopoulou Nikiforos Apostolikas Marios Kontis Ioannis Paraskevas 

作者机构:Gastroenterology UnitAgios Savvas Cancer HospitalAthensGreece Section of Nuclear MedicineAgios Savvas Cancer HospitalAthensGreece CT Department.Agios Savvas Cancer HospitalAthensGreece First Radiology-Oncology DepartmentAgios Savvas Cancer HospitalAthensGreece Pathology DepartmentAgios Savvas Cancer HospitalAthensGreece Economics and Statistics DepartmentAgios Savvas Cancer HospitalAthensGreece City University LondonLondonUnited Kingdom 

出 版 物:《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 (世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版))

年 卷 期:2004年第10卷第24期

页      面:3628-3633页

核心收录:

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100214[医学-肿瘤学] 10[医学] 

主  题:良性肿瘤 成本效力关系 CT 敏感性 腹部 

摘      要:AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy and the cost-effectiveness of this technique in the detection of gastroenteropancreatic cardnoid tumors and their metastases in comparison with conventional imaging ***: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) was performed in 24 patients with confirmed carcinoids and 7 under investigation. The results were compared with those of conventional imaging methods (chest X-ray, upper abdominal ultrasound, chest CT, upper and lower abdominal CT). Also a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed comparing the cost in Euro of several combinations of SRS with conventional imaging ***: SRS visualized primary or metastatic sites in 71.0% of cases and 61.3% of conventional imagings. The diagnostic sensitivity of the method was higher in patients with suspected lesions (85.7% vs57.1%). SRS was less sensitive in the detection of metastatic sites (78.9% vs 84.2%). The undetectable lesions by SRS metastatic sites were all in the liver. Between several imaging combinations, the combinations of chest X-ray/upper abdominal CT/SRS and chest CT/upper abdominal CT/SRS showed the highest sensitivity (88.75%) in terms of the number of detected lesions. The combinations of chest X-ray/upper abdominal US/SRS and chest CT/upper abdominal ultrasound/SRS yielded also a quite similar sensitivity (82%). Compared to the cost of the four sensitive combinations the combination of chest X-ray/upper abdominal ultrasound/SRS presented the lower cost,1183.99 Euro vs 1251.75 Euro for chest CT/upper abdominal ultrasound/SRS, 1294.93 Euro for chest X/ray/upper abdominal CT/SRS and 1362.75 Euro for chest CT/upper abdominal CT/***: SRS imaging is a very sensitive method for the detection of gastroenteropancreatic carcinoids but is less sensitive than ultrasound and CT in the detection of liver metastases. Between several imaging combinations, the combination of chest X-ray/upper abdominal CT/SRS shows the highest s

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分