Comparison of Social Benefits of Forest under Different Management Models: A Case Study of Close-to-Nature Forest Management in Harbin, China

作     者：BAI Xiuping1 WU Keyi2 ZHAO Debin2 ZHOU Jinbei31. Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, P. R. China2. Harbin Forestry Bureau, Harbin 150008, P. R. China3. Danqinghe Experiment Forest Farm, Yilan 154800, P. R. China 

出 版 物：《Chinese Forestry Science and Technology》 (中国林业科技（英文版）)

年 卷 期：2011年第10卷第Z1期

页      面：26-37页

学科分类：0907[农学-林学] 090704[农学-森林经理学] 09[农学] 

基　　金：funded by "Cultivating Permanent Forest in North China National-owned Forest Area with Close-to-nature Silviculture" the cooperation project (2009-04) of Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information Chinese Academy of Forestry Harbin Forestry Bureau 

主　　题：forest management social benefit selective cutting people’s livelihood Harbin China 

摘      要：Different forest management modes definitely create different results. A study of social benefits nurtured by scientific forest management had been conducted in 1998-2008 with Danqinghe Experiment Forest Farm, Zhuanshan Experiment Forest Farm and Shanhe Experiment Forest Farmtogether as the project area. The method that was centered on quantification and supplemented byqualification was employed to compare the social benefits of forests separately under the scientificmanagement model and the traditional management model. The study illustrated the huge social benefits produced by scientific forest management with detailed data.