咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Differences between IC Analysi... 收藏

Differences between IC Analysis and TG Approach

Differences between IC Analysis and TG Approach

作     者:张美玲 

作者机构:Canvard College of Beijing Technology and Business University 

出 版 物:《海外英语》 (Overseas English)

年 卷 期:2014年第16期

页      面:282-284页

学科分类:0501[文学-中国语言文学] 0303[法学-社会学] 050102[文学-语言学及应用语言学] 03[法学] 030303[法学-人类学] 05[文学] 

主  题:Keyswords: IC analysis TG approach syntactical ana 

摘      要:Structuralism and generative approach are two representative syntax theories, which study language from different perspectives. They employ different methodologies i.e. Immediate constituent(IC) Analysis and transformational-generative(TG)approach to make syntactical analysis. In this paper, these two methods will be applied to analyze some sentences for further discussion and comparison. After analysis by examples, we find that both these two methods have their merits and inadequacies. To some extent, TG method can help IC analysis solve some problems. However, TG grammar is by no means complete and *** are needed to reach its ultimate goal of producing a universal grammar for all human languages.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分