咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >6-weekly bevacizumab versus 4-... 收藏

6-weekly bevacizumab versus 4-weekly ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration:a 2-year outcome

6-weekly bevacizumab versus 4-weekly ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a 2-year outcome

作     者:Patrick J Chiam Vivian W Ho Nicholas M Hickley Venkat Kotamarthi 

作者机构:St.Paurs Eye UnitRoyal Liverpool University HospitalLiverpool L7 8XPUK Eye Care CentreLeighton HospitalCrewe CW1 4Q JUK Eye DepartmentLeicester Royal InfirmaryLeicester LE15WWUK 

出 版 物:《International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition)》 (国际眼科杂志(英文版))

年 卷 期:2016年第9卷第4期

页      面:551-555页

核心收录:

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100212[医学-眼科学] 10[医学] 

主  题:bevacizumab ranibizumab neovascular age related macular degeneration treatment on as required basis 

摘      要:AIM: To compare visual acuity and central macular thickness(CMT) changes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients treated with either 6weekly bevacizumab regimen or 4 weekly ranibizumab on an as required basis.·METHODS: Patients made an informed choice between bevacizumab 1.25 mg or ranibizumab 0.5 mg. The selected treatment was administered in the first 3 *** patients were followed-up 6 weekly and ranibizumab 4 weekly. Retreatment criteria was based on the reduction of 〉5 letters in the best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA), the presence of retinal fluid on optical coherence tomography(OCT) or new retinal haemorrhage.·RESULTS: Visual acuity at 2y bevacizumab patients gained 7. 0 letters and ranibizumab 9. 2( P = 0. 31, 95 %CI-6.4 to 2.0). At 2y 86% of bevacizumab and 94%ranibizumab patients had not lost 15 letters or more(P =0.13). Mean CMT decreased at 2y bevacizumab by 146 μm,ranibizumab 160 μm(P =0.72). Mean number of injections was at 2y bevacizumzb 11.9, ranibizumab 10.3(P =0.023).· CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab 6 weekly on an as required basis was not demonstrably non-inferior to ranibizumab 4 weekly pro re nata(prn) in terms of BCVA and change in CMT. In the bevacizumab group, one more injection was required in the second year compared to the ranibizumab group.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分